166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1517800)
1. Comparison of myelography combined with postmyelographic spinal CT and MRI in suspected metastatic disease of the spinal canal.
Helweg-Larsen S; Wagner A; Kjaer L; Johnsen A; Boesen J; Palner T; Sørensen PS
J Neurooncol; 1992 Jul; 13(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 1517800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Magnetic resonance imaging compared to myelography and CT. Diagnostic value in patients with suspected medullary spinal compression syndrome].
Wagner A; Helweg-Larsen SE; Kjaer LU; Johnsen AH; Boesen J; Johansen TP; Sørensen PS
Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Oct; 156(42):6204-7. PubMed ID: 7998358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of MR imaging in evaluating metastatic spinal disease.
Smoker WR; Godersky JC; Knutzon RK; Keyes WD; Norman D; Bergman W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1241-8. PubMed ID: 3500616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal: axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication.
Willén J; Danielson B; Gaulitz A; Niklason T; Schönström N; Hansson T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Dec; 22(24):2968-76. PubMed ID: 9431634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected metastatic spinal cord compression.
Williams MP; Cherryman GR; Husband JE
Clin Radiol; 1989 May; 40(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 2752687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postmyelographic CT evaluation of multiple blocks due to metastases.
Tan WS; Wilbur AC; Spigos DG
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1985; 9(5):979-81. PubMed ID: 4031182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of spinal anatomy between 3-Tesla MRI and CT-myelography under healthy and pathological conditions.
Grams AE; Gempt J; Förschler A
Surg Radiol Anat; 2010 Jul; 32(6):581-5. PubMed ID: 19967536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spinal cord compression due to metastatic disease: diagnosis with MR imaging versus myelography.
Carmody RF; Yang PJ; Seeley GW; Seeger JF; Unger EC; Johnson JE
Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 2675185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of spinal magnetic resonance imaging and myelography in cancer patients.
Hagenau C; Grosh W; Currie M; Wiley RG
J Clin Oncol; 1987 Oct; 5(10):1663-9. PubMed ID: 3655863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lumbosacral epidural metastases: CT evaluation and comparison with myelography.
Anand AK; Krol G; Deck MD
Comput Radiol; 1983; 7(6):351-4. PubMed ID: 6641203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved magnetic resonance myelography of the lumbar spine using image fusion and volumetry.
Eberhardt K; Ganslandt O; Stadlbauer A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 24328762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy for spinal tumors: value of computed tomographic myelography in spinal cord delineation.
Thariat J; Castelli J; Chanalet S; Marcie S; Mammar H; Bondiau PY
Neurosurgery; 2009 Feb; 64(2 Suppl):A60-6. PubMed ID: 19165075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging of spinal intradural arachnoid cysts: MRI, myelography and CT.
Silbergleit R; Brunberg JA; Patel SC; Mehta BA; Aravapalli SR
Neuroradiology; 1998 Oct; 40(10):664-8. PubMed ID: 9833898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical usefulness of CT-myelogram comparing with the MRI in degenerative cervical spinal disorders: is CTM still useful for primary diagnostic tool?
Song KJ; Choi BW; Kim GH; Kim JR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 19525791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the narrow cervical spinal canal: a prospective comparison of MRI, myelography and CT-myelography.
Reul J; Gievers B; Weis J; Thron A
Neuroradiology; 1995 Apr; 37(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 7603592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MRI and neurological findings in patients with spinal metastases.
Switlyk MD; Hole KH; Skjeldal S; Hald JK; Knutstad K; Seierstad T; Zaikova O
Acta Radiol; 2012 Dec; 53(10):1164-72. PubMed ID: 23047848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis of non-osseous spinal metastatic disease: the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Batouli A; Braun J; Singh K; Gholamrezanezhad A; Casagranda BU; Alavi A
J Neurooncol; 2018 Jun; 138(2):221-230. PubMed ID: 29484521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of computed tomography of the spine to identify patients at high risk for epidural metastases.
Weissman DE; Gilbert M; Wang H; Grossman SA
J Clin Oncol; 1985 Nov; 3(11):1541-4. PubMed ID: 4056845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequency of unexpected multifocal metastasis in patients with acute spinal cord compression. Evaluation by low-field MR imaging in cancer patients.
Heldmann U; Myschetzky PS; Thomsen HS
Acta Radiol; 1997 May; 38(3):372-5. PubMed ID: 9191426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spinal computed tomography and computed tomographic metrizamide myelography in the early diagnosis of metastatic disease.
O'Rourke T; George CB; Redmond J; Davidson H; Cornett P; Fill WL; Spring DB; Sobel D; Dabe IB; Karl RD
J Clin Oncol; 1986 Apr; 4(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 3958768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
