These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15178198)

  • 1. The truthful signalling hypothesis: an explicit general equilibrium model.
    Hausken K; Hirshleifer J
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Jun; 228(4):497-511. PubMed ID: 15178198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Truthful signalling, the heritability paradox, and the Malthusian equi-marginal principle.
    Hausken K; Hirshleifer J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2008 Feb; 73(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 17991501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Male mating constraints affect mutual mate choice: prudent male courting and sperm-limited females.
    Härdling R; Gosden T; Aguilée R
    Am Nat; 2008 Aug; 172(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 18588428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Priority versus brute force: when should males begin guarding resources?
    Härdling R; Kokko H; Elwood RW
    Am Nat; 2004 Feb; 163(2):240-52. PubMed ID: 14970925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female preferences for indicators of male quality.
    van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ
    Am Nat; 2006 Dec; 168(6):742-57. PubMed ID: 17109317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should females prefer to mate with low-quality males?
    Cotar C; McNamara JM; Collins EJ; Houston AI
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Oct; 254(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 18625245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indirect mate choice, direct mate choice and species recognition in a bower-building cichlid fish lek.
    Genner MJ; Young KA; Haesler MP; Joyce DA
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 18547351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Make love not war: when should less competitive males choose low-quality but defendable females?
    Venner S; Bernstein C; Dray S; Bel-Venner MC
    Am Nat; 2010 Jun; 175(6):650-61. PubMed ID: 20415532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Competitive speciation and costs of choosiness.
    Kopp M; Hermisson J
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):1005-23. PubMed ID: 18513357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evolutionary advantage for extravagant honesty.
    Bullock S
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Jan; 292():30-8. PubMed ID: 21964260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unidirectional introgression of a sexually selected trait across an avian hybrid zone: a role for female choice?
    Stein AC; Uy JA
    Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1476-85. PubMed ID: 16929664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mating advantage of rare males in models of sexual selection.
    O'Donald P
    Nature; 1977 May; 267(5607):151-4. PubMed ID: 16073426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why do female migratory birds arrive later than males?
    Kokko H; Gunnarsson TG; Morrell LJ; Gill JA
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Nov; 75(6):1293-303. PubMed ID: 17032361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Male and female condition influence mating performance and sexual receptivity in two tropical fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) with contrasting life histories.
    Aluja M; Rull J; Sivinski J; Trujillo G; Pérez-Staples D
    J Insect Physiol; 2009 Dec; 55(12):1091-8. PubMed ID: 19666025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Female alternative reproductive behaviors: the effect of female group size on mate assessment and copying.
    Brennan BJ; Flaxman SM; Alonzo SH
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Aug; 253(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 18511084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual selection for male dominance reduces opportunities for female mate choice in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus).
    Reichard M; Bryja J; Ondracková M; Dávidová M; Kaniewska P; Smith C
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Apr; 14(5):1533-42. PubMed ID: 15813791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mate choice and optimal search behavior: fitness returns under the fixed sample and sequential search strategies.
    Wiegmann DD; Seubert SM; Wade GA
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Feb; 262(4):596-600. PubMed ID: 19825377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.