These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1517876)
1. Number and intensity of occlusal contacts following surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. Athanasiou AE J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Mar; 19(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 1517876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in bite force and occlusal contacts in patients treated for mandibular prognathism by orthognathic surgery. Iwase M; Sugimori M; Kurachi Y; Nagumo M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Jul; 56(7):850-5; discussion 855-6. PubMed ID: 9663576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of masticatory function following orthognathic surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. Shiratsuchi Y; Kouno K; Tashiro H J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1991 Oct; 19(7):299-303. PubMed ID: 1752969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in occlusal force after mandibular ramus osteotomy with and without Le Fort I osteotomy. Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 36(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 17239561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-year follow-up of changes in bite force and occlusal contact area after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with and without Le Fort I osteotomy. Choi YJ; Lim H; Chung CJ; Park KH; Kim KH Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 43(6):742-7. PubMed ID: 24630069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in bite force and occlusal contact area after orthognathic surgery for correction of mandibular prognathism. Ohkura K; Harada K; Morishima S; Enomoto S Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 11174588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in bite force after orthognathic surgical correction of mandibular prognathism: a systematic review. Islam I; Lim AAT; Wong RCW Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 46(6):746-755. PubMed ID: 28209396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of ramus, condyle, masseter muscle, and occlusal force before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism. Ueki K; Okabe K; Mukozawa A; Miyazaki M; Marukawa K; Hashiba Y; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Nov; 108(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 19699116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Morphologic and functional implications of the surgical-orthodontic management of mandibular prognathism: a comprehensive review. Athanasiou AE Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 May; 103(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 8480712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism. Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation and craniomandibular dysfunction in 16- to 17-year-old adolescents. Gianniri AI; Melsen B; Nielsen L; Athanasiou AE J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Jan; 18(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 2051247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of masticatory function after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for patients with mandibular prognathism. Kikuta T; Hara I; Seto T; Yoshioka I; Nakashima T; Yasumitsu C Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 8006486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bite force, occlusal contact area and masticatory efficiency before and after orthognathic surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. Iwase M; Ohashi M; Tachibana H; Toyoshima T; Nagumo M Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 35(12):1102-7. PubMed ID: 17097270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measure of bite force and occlusal contact area before and after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible using a new pressure-sensitive device: a preliminary report. Harada K; Watanabe M; Ohkura K; Enomoto S J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Apr; 58(4):370-3; discussion 373-4. PubMed ID: 10759115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in occlusal state of patients with mandibular prognathism after orthognathic surgery: a pilot study. Nagai I; Tanaka N; Noguchi M; Suda Y; Sonoda T; Kohama G Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Dec; 39(6):429-33. PubMed ID: 11735137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The amount of mandibular setback influence on occlusal force following sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Moroi A; Yoshizawa K; Iguchi R; Ikawa H; Kosaka A; Hotta A; Tsutsui T; Saida Y; Ueki K J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 43(9):1743-8. PubMed ID: 26431610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Occlusal tooth contacts in natural normal adult dentition in centric occlusion studied by photocclusion technique. Athanasiou AE; Melsen B; Kimmel P Scand J Dent Res; 1989 Oct; 97(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 2617142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Skeletal stability after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism by vertical ramus osteotomy. Athanasiou AE; Mavreas D; Toutountzakis N; Ritzau M Eur J Orthod; 1992 Apr; 14(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 1582456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The evaluation of jaw function subsequent to bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Yang XW; Dong YJ; Long X; Zhang GZ; Kao CT Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Jul; 100(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 15953911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in head posture and nasopharyngeal airway following surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. Wenzel A; Williams S; Ritzau M Eur J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 11(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2714390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]