BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15179395)

  • 1. Biomechanical evaluation of mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis by using the finite element method.
    Basciftci FA; Korkmaz HH; Işeri H; Malkoç S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jun; 125(6):706-15. PubMed ID: 15179395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term skeletal and dental effects of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.
    Del Santo M; Guerrero CA; Buschang PH; English JD; Samchukov ML; Bell WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):485-93. PubMed ID: 11094362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A finite element study on the effects of midsymphyseal distraction osteogenesis on the mandible and articular disc.
    Kim KN; Cha BK; Choi DS; Jang I; Yi YJ; Jost-Brinkmann PG
    Angle Orthod; 2012 May; 82(3):464-71. PubMed ID: 21848406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the mandible and temporomandibular joint on simulated occlusal forces before and after vertical ramus elongation by distraction osteogenesis.
    Kofod T; Cattaneo PM; Melsen B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 May; 16(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 15915108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis on mandibular structures.
    Malkoç S; Işeri H; Karaman AI; Mutlu N; Küçükkolbaşi H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):603-11. PubMed ID: 17110257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress distribution on the mandibular condyle and the distraction area in distraction osteogenesis by finite element analysis.
    Li P; Long J; Tang W; Li J; Liang R; Tian DW
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):1031-7. PubMed ID: 23714940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis using a bone-supported distractor.
    Bayram M; Ozer M; Alkan A
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jul; 77(4):745-52. PubMed ID: 17605491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical considerations of mandibular lengthening and widening by gradual distraction using a computer model.
    Samchukov ML; Cope JB; Harper RP; Ross JD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Jan; 56(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 9437982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mandibular midline distraction using a simple device.
    Uckan S; Guler N; Arman A; Mutlu N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):711-7. PubMed ID: 16731388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical evaluation of chincup treatment with various force vectors.
    Basciftci FA; Korkmaz HH; Uşümez S; Eraslan O
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):773-81. PubMed ID: 19061804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stress distribution in mandible and temporomandibular joint by mandibular distraction: a 3-dimensional finite-element analysis.
    Katada H; Arakawa T; Ichimura K; Sueishi K; Sameshima GT
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2009; 50(4):161-8. PubMed ID: 20179391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: a finite element study.
    Boccaccio A; Lamberti L; Pappalettere C; Cozzani M; Siciliani G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 18675208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mandibular midline distraction using a simple device.
    Uckan S; Guler N; Arman A; Mutlu N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):e85-91. PubMed ID: 16243234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the mandible and temporomandibular joint during vertical ramus elongation by distraction osteogenesis.
    Kofod T; Cattaneo PM; Dalstra M; Melsen B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 16(4):586-93. PubMed ID: 16077302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical effects of surgical cut direction in unilateral mandibular lengthening by distraction osteogenesis using a finite element model.
    Tehranchi A; Behnia H; Heidarpour M; Toutiaee B; Khosropour MJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 41(5):667-72. PubMed ID: 22172284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical effects of rapid maxillary expansion on the craniofacial skeleton, studied by the finite element method.
    Işeri H; Tekkaya AE; Oztan O; Bilgiç S
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Aug; 20(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 9753816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Condylar displacement related to mandibular symphyseal distraction.
    Braun S; Bottrel JA; Legan HL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Feb; 121(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 11840130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model surgery prediction for mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis.
    Whitman DH; Connaughton B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 28(6):421-3. PubMed ID: 10609742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term skeletal effects of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. An implant study.
    Iseri H; Malkoç S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):512-7. PubMed ID: 16043467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite-element analysis of 3 situations of trauma in the human edentulous mandible.
    Santos LS; Rossi AC; Freire AR; Matoso RI; Caria PH; Prado FB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 73(4):683-91. PubMed ID: 25577458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.