BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15180668)

  • 1. A cautionary note on the robustness of latent class models for estimating diagnostic error without a gold standard.
    Albert PS; Dodd LE
    Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):427-35. PubMed ID: 15180668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random effects models in latent class analysis for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests.
    Qu Y; Tan M; Kutner MH
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):797-810. PubMed ID: 8805757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Latent variable modeling of diagnostic accuracy.
    Yang I; Becker MP
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):948-58. PubMed ID: 9290225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: a case study.
    Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4469-88. PubMed ID: 18551515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using latent class models that account for conditional dependence between tests: a simulation study.
    Keddie SH; Baerenbold O; Keogh RH; Bradley J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Mar; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 36894883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When do latent class models overstate accuracy for diagnostic and other classifiers in the absence of a gold standard?
    Spencer BD
    Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 22017371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imputation approaches for estimating diagnostic accuracy for multiple tests from partially verified designs.
    Albert PS
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):947-57. PubMed ID: 17825024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
    Pepe MS; Janes H
    Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):474-84. PubMed ID: 17085745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement errors in caries diagnosis: some further latent class models.
    Formann AK
    Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):865-71. PubMed ID: 7981408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A probit latent class model with general correlation structures for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests.
    Xu H; Craig BA
    Biometrics; 2009 Dec; 65(4):1145-55. PubMed ID: 19210729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Joint analysis of time-to-event and multiple binary indicators of latent classes.
    Larsen K
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 15032777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic test analyses in search of their gold standard: latent class analyses with random effects.
    Goetghebeur E; Liinev J; Boelaert M; Van der Stuyft P
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Jun; 9(3):231-48. PubMed ID: 11084706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
    van Smeden M; Oberski DL; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK; Moons KG; de Groot JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Random effects modeling approaches for estimating ROC curves from repeated ordinal tests without a gold standard.
    Albert PS
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):593-602. PubMed ID: 17688512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Random effects models for assessing diagnostic accuracy of traditional Chinese doctors in absence of a gold standard.
    Wang Z; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2012 Mar; 31(7):661-71. PubMed ID: 21626532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using latent class models to characterize and assess relative error in discrete measurements.
    Espeland MA; Handelman SL
    Biometrics; 1989 Jun; 45(2):587-99. PubMed ID: 2765639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy From Studies With Multiple Raters and Partial Gold Standard Evaluation.
    Albert PS; Dodd LE
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2008 Mar; 103(481):61-73. PubMed ID: 19802353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic test performance.
    Torrance-Rynard VL; Walter SD
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2157-75. PubMed ID: 9330426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using pseudogold standards and latent-class analysis in combination to evaluate the accuracy of three diagnostic tests.
    Nérette P; Stryhn H; Dohoo I; Hammell L
    Prev Vet Med; 2008 Jul; 85(3-4):207-25. PubMed ID: 18355935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard.
    Toft N; Jørgensen E; Højsgaard S
    Prev Vet Med; 2005 Apr; 68(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 15795013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.