243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15180681)
1. The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures.
Pepe MS; Cai T
Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):528-35. PubMed ID: 15180681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Semiparametric estimation of time-dependent ROC curves for longitudinal marker data.
Zheng Y; Heagerty PJ
Biostatistics; 2004 Oct; 5(4):615-32. PubMed ID: 15475423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results.
Pepe MS
Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9544511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Semi-parametric ROC regression analysis with placement values.
Cai T
Biostatistics; 2004 Jan; 5(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 14744827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve.
Qin G; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):613-22. PubMed ID: 16918927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Model checking for ROC regression analysis.
Cai T; Zheng Y
Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):152-63. PubMed ID: 17447940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves.
Heagerty PJ; Zheng Y
Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 15737082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Diagnostic accuracy].
Simundić AM
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A model free approach to combining biomarkers.
Pfeiffer RM; Bur E
Biom J; 2008 Aug; 50(4):558-70. PubMed ID: 18663762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ROC graphs for assessing the ability of a diagnostic marker to detect three disease classes with an umbrella ordering.
Nakas CT; Alonzo TA
Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):603-9. PubMed ID: 17688513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic tests: a statistical review.
Schulzer M
Muscle Nerve; 1994 Jul; 17(7):815-9. PubMed ID: 8008012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combining diagnostic test results to increase accuracy.
Pepe MS; Thompson ML
Biostatistics; 2000 Jun; 1(2):123-40. PubMed ID: 12933515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
