18 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15181258)
1. Height Restrictions for Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry: What Are Our Options for Body Composition and Bone Health Precision?
Redinger AL; Russell JL; Allen SMF; Baker BS
J Strength Cond Res; 2024 Jul; 38(7):e359-e365. PubMed ID: 38662930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Premenopausal overweight women do not lose bone during moderate weight loss with adequate or higher calcium intake.
Riedt CS; Schlussel Y; von Thun N; Ambia-Sobhan H; Stahl T; Field MP; Sherrell RM; Shapses SA
Am J Clin Nutr; 2007 Apr; 85(4):972-80. PubMed ID: 17413095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density.
Hamdy R; Kiebzak GM; Seier E; Watts NB
Osteoporos Int; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1772-80. PubMed ID: 17019523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of age-specific bone mineral density and comparison of diagnosis and prevalence of primary osteoporosis in Chinese women based on both Chinese and World Health Organization criteria.
Wu XP; Liao EY; Zhang H; Dai RC; Shan PF; Cao XZ; Liu SP; Jiang Y
J Bone Miner Metab; 2004; 22(4):382-91. PubMed ID: 15221499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Post-menopausal vertebral osteoporosis: can dual energy X-ray absorptiometry forearm bone density substitute for axial measurements?
Ryan PJ; Blake GM; Herd R; Parker J; Fogelman I
Br J Rheumatol; 1994 Jun; 33(6):546-9. PubMed ID: 8205402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone mineral density of the ultra-distal radius: are we ignoring valuable information?
Schwarz Y; Goldshtein I; Friedman YE; Peltz-Sinvani N; Brodavka M; Kowal D; Vered I; Tripto-Shkolnik L
Arch Osteoporos; 2023 Feb; 18(1):28. PubMed ID: 36725758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of using the ultradistal radius region of interest on diagnostic classification.
Kiebzak GM; Lewiecki EM; Petak SM
J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 15181258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Which central dual X-ray absorptiometry skeletal sites and regions of interest should be used to determine the diagnosis of osteoporosis?
Hamdy RC; Petak SM; Lenchik L;
J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5 Suppl():S11-8. PubMed ID: 12464707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
