These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15181355)

  • 21. Converting LEA to Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score in neuro-ophthalmology patients.
    Prihatningtias R; Hardiyanti D; Valencia L
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 72(Suppl 3):S505-S508. PubMed ID: 38648459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D; Bonette L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of 3rd-order aberrations on human vision.
    Fernández-Sánchez V; Ponce ME; Lara F; Montés-Micó R; Castejón-Mochón JF; López-Gil N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1339-44. PubMed ID: 18655985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Repeatability of the Waterloo Four-Contrast LogMAR Visual Acuity chart and Near Vision Test card on a group of normal young adults.
    Cho P; Woo GC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 15315657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test.
    Arditi A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):2225-9. PubMed ID: 15914645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measuring resolution in the contrast domain: the small letter contrast test.
    Rabin J; Wicks J
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 73(6):398-403. PubMed ID: 8807651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reliability and consistency of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity measures in advanced eye disease.
    Kiser AK; Mladenovich D; Eshraghi F; Bourdeau D; Dagnelie G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):946-54. PubMed ID: 16317369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The practical near acuity chart (PNAC) and prediction of visual ability at near.
    Wolffsohn JS; Cochrane AL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Mar; 20(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 10829130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contrast sensitivity and glare in cataract using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Williamson TH; Strong NP; Sparrow J; Aggarwal RK; Harrad R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1992 Dec; 76(12):719-22. PubMed ID: 1486072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reading performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a study using the MNREAD charts.
    Virgili G; Pierrottet C; Parmeggiani F; Pennino M; Giacomelli G; Steindler P; Menchini U; Orzalesi N;
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(10):3418-24. PubMed ID: 15452044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of LogMAR Eye charts with angular vision for visually impaired: the Berkeley rudimentary vision test vs LogMAR One target Landolt ring Eye chart.
    Miwa M; Iwanami M; Oba MS; Mizuki N; Nishida T
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 251(12):2761-7. PubMed ID: 24057176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of an Automated Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Low-contrast Letter Acuity Test.
    Pang Y; Sparschu L; Nylin E; Wang J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):370-376. PubMed ID: 32413009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Repeatability and intercorrelations of standard vision tests as a function of age.
    Lovie-Kitchin JE; Brown B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Aug; 77(8):412-20. PubMed ID: 10966067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development and testing of an automated computer tablet-based method for self-testing of high and low contrast near visual acuity in ophthalmic patients.
    Aslam TM; Parry NR; Murray IJ; Salleh M; Col CD; Mirza N; Czanner G; Tahir HJ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):891-9. PubMed ID: 26899899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A weighted version of the Melbourne Low-Vision ADL Index: a measure of disability impact.
    Haymes SA; Johnston AW; Heyes AD
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Aug; 78(8):565-79. PubMed ID: 11525547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Short-Term Visual Performance of Novel Extended Depth-of-Focus Contact Lenses.
    Tilia D; Bakaraju RC; Chung J; Sha J; Delaney S; Munro A; Thomas V; Ehrmann K; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Apr; 93(4):435-44. PubMed ID: 26808384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Self-reported importance and difficulty of driving in a low-vision clinic population.
    Massof RW; Deremeik JT; Park WL; Grover LL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Nov; 48(11):4955-62. PubMed ID: 17962445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity testing for sports vision.
    Zimmerman AB; Lust KL; Bullimore MA
    Eye Contact Lens; 2011 May; 37(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 21378574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing LEA numbers low vision book and Feinbloom visual acuity charts.
    Hardgrave N; Hatley J; Lewerenz D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 89(11):1611-8. PubMed ID: 23026789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The handy eye chart: a new visual acuity test for use in children.
    Cromelin CH; Candy TR; Lynn MJ; Harrington CL; Hutchinson AK
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Oct; 119(10):2009-13. PubMed ID: 22796307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.