459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15181522)
21. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K;
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Study of the efficiency of a non-mydriatic retinal camera in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy].
Hernáez-Ortega MC; Soto-Pedre E; Vázquez JA; Gutiérrez MA; Asua J
Rev Clin Esp; 1998 Apr; 198(4):194-9. PubMed ID: 9633202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy.
Ahmed J; Ward TP; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Vigersky RA
Diabetes Care; 2006 Oct; 29(10):2205-9. PubMed ID: 17003294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can we predict which patients are at risk of having an ungradeable digital image for screening for diabetic retinopathy?
Murgatroyd H; Cox A; Ellingford A; Ellis JD; Macewen CJ; Leese GP
Eye (Lond); 2008 Mar; 22(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 17024219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative study of the polaroid and digital non-mydriatic cameras in the detection of referrable diabetic retinopathy in Australia.
Phiri R; Keeffe JE; Harper CA; Taylor HR
Diabet Med; 2006 Aug; 23(8):867-72. PubMed ID: 16911624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Is fundus photography useful in screening for diabetic retinopathy in patients with type II diabetes mellitus?].
Verhoeven S; van Ballegooie E; Crijns H; Hylkema HA; Loeve AA; Casparie AF
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Aug; 137(34):1713-7. PubMed ID: 8371813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic accuracy of non-mydriatic fundus camera for screening of diabetic retinopathy: A hospital based observational study in Pakistan.
Fahadullah M; Memon NA; Salim S; Ahsan S; Fahim MF; Mumtaz SN; Shaikh SA; Memon MS
J Pak Med Assoc; 2019 Mar; 69(3):378-382. PubMed ID: 30890831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Williams GA; Scott IU; Haller JA; Maguire AM; Marcus D; McDonald HR
Ophthalmology; 2004 May; 111(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 15121388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural area using single-field, digital fundus images.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Wongcumchang N; Surawongsin P; Panyawatananukul E; Tiensuwan M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 15962667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a comparative trial of photography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
Wilson PJ; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Ellingford A; Talbot J; Leese GP
Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 20145421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Practical application of the European Field Guide in screening for diabetic retinopathy by using ophthalmoscopy and 35 mm retinal slides.
Gibbins RL; Owens DR; Allen JC; Eastman L
Diabetologia; 1998 Jan; 41(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 9498631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital non-mydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo colour transparencies.
Hansen AB; Sander B; Larsen M; Kleener J; Borch-Johnsen K; Klein R; Lund-Andersen H
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):656-65. PubMed ID: 15606460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Telemedical diagnosis of anterior segment eye diseases: validation of digital slit-lamp still images.
Kumar S; Yogesan K; Constable IJ
Eye (Lond); 2009 Mar; 23(3):652-60. PubMed ID: 18274557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison between an ophthalmic optician and an ophthalmologist in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Hammond CJ; Shackleton J; Flanagan DW; Herrtage J; Wade J
Eye (Lond); 1996; 10 ( Pt 1)():107-12. PubMed ID: 8763314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Light and portable novel device for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Ting DS; Tay-Kearney ML; Kanagasingam Y
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(1):e40-6. PubMed ID: 22044677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The photographic screening for retinopathy of prematurity study (photo-ROP). Primary outcomes.
Photographic Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity (Photo-ROP) Cooperative Group
Retina; 2008 Mar; 28(3 Suppl):S47-54. PubMed ID: 18317345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity.
Li HK; Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Esquivel A; Florez-Arango JF; Krupinski EA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):3184-92. PubMed ID: 20053978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Telemedicine approach to screening for severe retinopathy of prematurity: a pilot study.
Ells AL; Holmes JM; Astle WF; Williams G; Leske DA; Fielden M; Uphill B; Jennett P; Hebert M
Ophthalmology; 2003 Nov; 110(11):2113-7. PubMed ID: 14597517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
