1024 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15182406)
1. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - results of 200 consecutive cases in a Canadian medical institution.
Tse E; Knaus R
Can J Urol; 2004 Apr; 11(2):2172-85. PubMed ID: 15182406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications, urinary continence, and oncologic outcome of 1000 laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomies-experience at the Charité Hospital Berlin, Campus Mitte.
Lein M; Stibane I; Mansour R; Hege C; Roigas J; Wille A; Jung K; Kristiansen G; Schnorr D; Loening SA; Deger S
Eur Urol; 2006 Dec; 50(6):1278-82; discussion 1283-4. PubMed ID: 16846677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases.
Rassweiler J; Sentker L; Seemann O; Hatzinger M; Rumpelt HJ
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2101-8. PubMed ID: 11696715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an assessment of 156 cases.
Brown JA; Rodin D; Lee B; Dahl DM
Urology; 2005 Feb; 65(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 15708046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of surgical quality.
Touijer K; Guillonneau B
Eur Urol; 2006 Apr; 49(4):625-32. PubMed ID: 16488072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary result of Thailand series.
Nualyong C; Srinualnad S; Taweemonkongsap T; Amornvesukit T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Sep; 89(9):1440-6. PubMed ID: 17100382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status.
Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Grande S; Morra I; Scarpa RM
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1377-83. PubMed ID: 19243886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Ahlering TE; Skarecky D; Lee D; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1738-41. PubMed ID: 14532766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oncologic outcome and continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 3 years' follow-up in a "second generation center".
Galli S; Simonato A; Bozzola A; Gregori A; Lissiani A; Scaburri A; Gaboardi F
Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):859-65. PubMed ID: 16519991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: initial experience after 70 procedures.
Stolzenburg JU; Do M; Rabenalt R; Pfeiffer H; Horn L; Truss MC; Jonas U; Dorschner W
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2066-71. PubMed ID: 12771721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
Rassweiler J; Seemann O; Schulze M; Teber D; Hatzinger M; Frede T
J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1689-93. PubMed ID: 12686809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Link BA; Nelson R; Josephson DY; Yoshida JS; Crocitto LE; Kawachi MH; Wilson TG
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our technique.
Curto F; Benijts J; Pansadoro A; Barmoshe S; Hoepffner JL; Mugnier C; Piechaud T; Gaston R
Eur Urol; 2006 Feb; 49(2):344-52. PubMed ID: 16413102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and body mass index: an assessment of 151 sequential cases.
Brown JA; Rodin DM; Lee B; Dahl DM
J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):442-5. PubMed ID: 15643198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Improve recovery of urinary continence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a clinical report of 51 cases].
Ma LL; Hong K; Huang Y; Wang GL; Xiao CL; Lu J; Tian XJ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 46(24):1882-4. PubMed ID: 19134376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis.
Erdogru T; Teber D; Frede T; Marrero R; Hammady A; Seemann O; Rassweiler J
Eur Urol; 2004 Sep; 46(3):312-9; discussion 320. PubMed ID: 15306100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
