136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15182988)
1. Intramedullary nails with two lag screws.
Brown CJ; Wang CJ; Yettram AL; Procter P
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Jun; 19(5):519-25. PubMed ID: 15182988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intramedullary femoral nails: one or two lag screws? A preliminary study.
Paul JP
Med Eng Phys; 2004 May; 26(4):359; author reply 360. PubMed ID: 15121063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical analysis of retrograde intramedullary nail fixation in distal femoral fractures.
Chen SH; Yu TC; Chang CH; Lu YC
Knee; 2008 Oct; 15(5):384-9. PubMed ID: 18722126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite element analysis of a femoral retrograde intramedullary nail subject to gait loading.
Cheung G; Zalzal P; Bhandari M; Spelt JK; Papini M
Med Eng Phys; 2004 Mar; 26(2):93-108. PubMed ID: 15036177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intramedullary femoral nails: one or two lag screws? A preliminary study.
Wang CJ; Brown CJ; Yettram AL; Procter P
Med Eng Phys; 2000 Nov; 22(9):613-24. PubMed ID: 11259930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A short plate compression screw with diagonal bolts--a biomechanical evaluation performed experimentally and by numerical computation.
Peleg E; Mosheiff R; Liebergall M; Mattan Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):963-8. PubMed ID: 16893595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of muscular contractions on the stress analysis of distal femoral interlocking nailing.
Shih KS; Tseng CS; Lee CC; Lin SC
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Jan; 23(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 17945402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increasing bending strength and pullout strength in conical pedicle screws: biomechanical tests and finite element analyses.
Chao CK; Hsu CC; Wang JL; Lin J
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 18391719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new intramedullary nailing device for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures: a biomechanical study.
Wang G; Pan T; Peng X; Wang J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Mar; 23(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 18079030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Biomechanics of femoral interlocking nails at the bone-implant transition].
Schandelmaier P; Farouk O; Krettek C; Mannss J; Tscherne H
Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1997; 382(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 9324617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Load distribution between cephalic screws in a dual lag screw trochanteric nail.
Henschel J; Eberle S; Augat P
J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 11():41. PubMed ID: 27039374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The effect of an angle-stable plate-screw connection and various screw diameters on the stability of plate osteosynthesis. An FE model study].
Seide K; Zierold W; Wolter D; Kortmann HR
Unfallchirurg; 1990 Dec; 93(12):552-8. PubMed ID: 2281325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite element analysis of a bone-implant system with the proximal femur nail.
Helwig P; Faust G; Hindenlang U; Kröplin B; Eingartner C
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):411-9. PubMed ID: 17065762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.
Heiney JP; Barnett MD; Vrabec GA; Schoenfeld AJ; Baji A; Njus GO
J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 19204519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Femoral head lag screw position for cephalomedullary nails: a biomechanical analysis.
Kuzyk PR; Zdero R; Shah S; Olsen M; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Jul; 26(7):414-21. PubMed ID: 22337483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increasing nail-cortical contact to increase fixation stability and decrease implant strain in antegrade locked nailing of distal femoral fractures: a biomechanical study.
Huang SC; Lin CC; Lin J
J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):436-42. PubMed ID: 19065112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The "Z-effect" phenomenon defined: a laboratory study.
Strauss EJ; Kummer FJ; Koval KJ; Egol KA
J Orthop Res; 2007 Dec; 25(12):1568-73. PubMed ID: 17592624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative analysis of different treatments for distal femur fractures using the finite element method.
Cegoñino J; García Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Palanca D; Seral B; Seral F
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Oct; 7(5):245-56. PubMed ID: 15621647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fixation of the femoral condyles: a mechanical comparison of small and large fragment screw fixation.
Khalafi A; Hazelwood S; Curtiss S; Wolinsky P
J Trauma; 2008 Mar; 64(3):740-4. PubMed ID: 18332817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preventing distal pullout of posterior spine instrumentation in thoracic hyperkyphosis: a biomechanical analysis.
Sun E; Alkalay R; Vader D; Snyder BD
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19494747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
