These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1518346)

  • 1. Preliminary results with the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Sep; 102(9):1006-13. PubMed ID: 1518346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clarion cochlear implant: phase I investigational results.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Haggerty HS
    Am J Otol; 1993 May; 14(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 8372924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The CLARION Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant.
    Kessler DK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1999 Apr; 177():8-16. PubMed ID: 10214794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The University of California, San Francisco/Storz cochlear implant program.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Rebscher SJ; Yanda J
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):287-305. PubMed ID: 3520442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State of the art of cochlear implants. The UCSF experience.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK
    Am J Otol; 1989 Mar; 10(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 2660581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consonant perception by users of Nucleus and Clarion multichannel cochlear implants.
    Doyle KJ; Mills D; Larky J; Kessler D; Luxford WM; Schindler RA
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 8588676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Considerations on the rehabilitation of the hearing in cochlear implant patients].
    Amadori M; Pantano N; Cestaro A; Babighian G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1996 Aug; 16(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9082826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Clarion Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant--surgical technique, complications, and results: a single institutional experience.
    Lalwani AK; Larky JB; Wareing MJ; Kwast K; Schindler RA
    Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 9455952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cochlear implant: a comparison of single-channel and multichannel results.
    Doyle PJ; Pijl S; Noel FJ
    J Otolaryngol; 1991 Jun; 20(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 1870169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
    Donaldson GS; Allen SL
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
    Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The UCSF/Storz multichannel cochlear implant: patient results.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Rebscher SJ; Yanda JL; Jackler RK
    Laryngoscope; 1986 Jun; 96(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 3754921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The UCSF/Storz cochlear implant: patient performance.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK
    Am J Otol; 1987 May; 8(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 3307448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech perception of children using Nucleus, Clarion or Med-El cochlear implants.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Kishon-Rabin L; Kaplan-Neeman R; Muchnik C; Kronenberg J; Hildesheimer M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1675-83. PubMed ID: 15955572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical results of the French multichannel cochlear implant.
    Fugain C; Meyer B; Chabolle F; Chouard CH
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():237-46. PubMed ID: 6596848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC; Li N; Kasturi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 17902741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.