These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15185398)

  • 1. Case-control association studies with matching and genomic controlling.
    Lee WC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 27(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 15185398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing population stratification bias: stratum matching is better than exposure.
    Lee WC; Wang LY
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 18619810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robust genomic control and robust delta centralization tests for case-control association studies.
    Zang Y; Zhang H; Yang Y; Zheng G
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(3-4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17310128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Case-control association tests correcting for population stratification.
    Köhler K; Bickeböller H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2006 Jan; 70(Pt 1):98-115. PubMed ID: 16441260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A critical evaluation of genomic control methods for genetic association studies.
    Dadd T; Weale ME; Lewis CM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 May; 33(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 19051284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CAPL: a novel association test using case-control and family data and accounting for population stratification.
    Chung RH; Schmidt MA; Morris RW; Martin ER
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 34(7):747-55. PubMed ID: 20878716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tests for gene-environment interaction from case-control data: a novel study of type I error, power and designs.
    Mukherjee B; Ahn J; Gruber SB; Rennert G; Moreno V; Chatterjee N
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 32(7):615-26. PubMed ID: 18473390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association Analysis under Population Stratification: A Two-Stage Procedure Utilizing Population- and Family-Based Analyses.
    Lin HW; Chen YH
    Hum Hered; 2010; 69(3):160-70. PubMed ID: 20029228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conditional likelihood methods for haplotype-based association analysis using matched case-control data.
    Chen J; Rodriguez C
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1099-107. PubMed ID: 18078481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploiting gene-environment independence in family-based case-control studies: increased power for detecting associations, interactions and joint effects.
    Chatterjee N; Kalaylioglu Z; Carroll RJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 28(2):138-56. PubMed ID: 15593088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A powerful two-stage association test using case-control and case-parents genotype data.
    Cheng KF; Lin WJ; Chen JH; Horng JT
    Hum Hered; 2009; 68(4):278-87. PubMed ID: 19622894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Use of case-parents trio for epidemiological studies of association between genetic polymorphisms and complex diseases].
    Santos JL; Pérez F; Carrasco E; Albala C
    Rev Med Chil; 2002 Nov; 130(11):1307-15. PubMed ID: 12587516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A computer program to estimate power and relative efficiency to assess multiplicative interactions in flexibly matched case-control studies.
    Stürmer T; Gefeller O; Brenner H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Jun; 74(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 15135577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When a case is not a case: effects of phenotype misclassification on power and sample size requirements for the transmission disequilibrium test with affected child trios.
    Buyske S; Yang G; Matise TC; Gordon D
    Hum Hered; 2009; 67(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 19172087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive two-stage analysis of genetic association in case-control designs.
    Zheng G; Song K; Elston RC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(3-4):175-86. PubMed ID: 17310127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mixed-effects logistic approach for association following linkage scan for complex disorders.
    Xu H; Shete S
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):230-7. PubMed ID: 17032287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genotypic association analysis using discordant-relative-pairs.
    Yan T; Yang YN; Cheng X; DeAngelis MM; Hoh J; Zhang H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 19040657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power and related statistical properties of conditional likelihood score tests for association studies in nuclear families with parental genotypes.
    Li Z; Gastwirth JL; Gail MH
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 May; 69(Pt 3):296-314. PubMed ID: 15845034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining unrelated family studies to improve the power of genetic association test.
    Cheng KF
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(2):311-25. PubMed ID: 18991259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.