These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15185986)

  • 21. Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a non-linear finite element study.
    Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Tu MG; Ko CC; Shen YW
    J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):409-17. PubMed ID: 18384926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis.
    Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Swaminathan D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 11858574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparative study of flexible (Polyactive) versus rigid (hydroxylapatite) permucosal dental implants. II. Histological aspects.
    Meijer GJ; Dalmeijer RA; de Putter C; van Blitterswijk CA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Feb; 24(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 9061618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Soft tissue and crestal bone changes around implants with platform-switched abutments placed nonsubmerged at subcrestal position: a 2-year clinical and radiographic evaluation.
    Aimetti M; Ferrarotti F; Mariani GM; Ghelardoni C; Romano F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1369-77. PubMed ID: 26478966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Functional assessment of dental implant osseointegration.
    Chang PC; Giannobile WV
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Oct; 32(5):e147-53. PubMed ID: 22754907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. LaminOss immediate-load implants: I. Introducing osteocompression in dentistry.
    Valen M; Locante WM
    J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 11831318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant.
    Hudieb MI; Wakabayashi N; Kasugai S
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1061-70. PubMed ID: 21189091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of dehiscences to the bone response of implants with an Acid-etched surface: an experimental study in miniature pigs.
    Ruehe B; Heberer S; Bayreuther K; Nelson K
    J Oral Implantol; 2011; 37(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 20557147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface.
    Brunski JB
    Clin Mater; 1992; 10(3):153-201. PubMed ID: 10149982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of excessive occlusal load on successfully-osseointegrated dental implants: a literature review.
    Chang M; Chronopoulos V; Mattheos N
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Aug; 4(3):142-50. PubMed ID: 23918506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Histologic and histomorphometric findings from retrieved, immediately occlusally loaded implants in humans.
    Romanos GE; Testori T; Degidi M; Piattelli A
    J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1823-32. PubMed ID: 16274300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 3D-FEA of osseointegration percentages and patterns on implant-bone interfacial stresses.
    Papavasiliou G; Kamposiora P; Bayne SC; Felton DA
    J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):485-91. PubMed ID: 9604579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A prospective multicenter 5-year radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels over time in 596 dental implants placed in 192 patients.
    Cochran DL; Nummikoski PV; Schoolfield JD; Jones AA; Oates TW
    J Periodontol; 2009 May; 80(5):725-33. PubMed ID: 19405825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results.
    Barone A; Orlando B; Cingano L; Marconcini S; Derchi G; Covani U
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jul; 83(7):836-46. PubMed ID: 22141358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part I. In vivo studies.
    Masuda T; Yliheikkilä PK; Felton DA; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 9509776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implant surface material, design, and osseointegration.
    Ogle OE
    Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Apr; 59(2):505-20. PubMed ID: 25835806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Implant survival and radiographic analysis of proximal bone levels surrounding a contemporary dental implant.
    Cavallaro JS
    Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 21448024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mechanical properties of bone tissues surrounding dental implant systems with different treatments and healing periods.
    Kim DG; Kwon HJ; Jeong YH; Kosel E; Lee DJ; Han JS; Kim HL; Kim DJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2211-2220. PubMed ID: 26832783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of Implant Thread Geometry on Secondary Stability, Bone Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact: A Biomechanical and Histological Analysis.
    Trisi P; Berardini M; Falco A; Podaliri Vulpiani M
    Implant Dent; 2015 Aug; 24(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 25939083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.