These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15186241)

  • 1. Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Iqbal MK; Firic S; Tulcan J; Karabucak B; Kim S
    Int Endod J; 2004 Jun; 37(6):359-64. PubMed ID: 15186241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
    Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of apical transportation in four Ni-Ti rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Iqbal MK; Maggiore F; Suh B; Edwards KR; Kang J; Kim S
    J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):587-91. PubMed ID: 14503833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
    J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro comparison of Profile GT and GTX nickel-titanium rotary instruments in apical transportation and length control in mandibular molar.
    Iqbal MK; Floratos S; Hsu YK; Karabucak B
    J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):302-4. PubMed ID: 20113795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
    Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography.
    Özer SY
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 21167759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of apical transportation between FlexMaster and Twisted Files rotary instruments.
    Duran-Sindreu F; García M; Olivieri JG; Mercadé M; Morelló S; Roig M
    J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):993-5. PubMed ID: 22703668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of canal transportation and changes in canal curvature of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    El Batouty KM; Elmallah WE
    J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1290-2. PubMed ID: 21846551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rotary nickel-titanium GT and ProTaper files for root canal shaping by novice operators: a radiographic and micro-computed tomography evaluation.
    Gekelman D; Ramamurthy R; Mirfarsi S; Paqué F; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19840653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
    Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro comparison in a manikin model: increasing apical enlargement with K3 and K3XF rotary instruments.
    Olivieri JG; Stöber E; García Font M; González JA; Bragado P; Roig M; Duran-Sindreu F
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1463-7. PubMed ID: 25146034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
    J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiological evaluation of the morphological changes of root canals shaped with ProTaper for hand use and the ProTaper and RaCe rotary instruments.
    Aguiar CM; Câmara AC
    Aust Endod J; 2008 Dec; 34(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 19032646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and RaCe rotary instruments.
    García M; Duran-Sindreu F; Mercadé M; Bueno R; Roig M
    J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):990-2. PubMed ID: 22703667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Root canal preparation with the NiTi systems K3, Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Sonntag D; Ott M; Kook K; Stachniss V
    Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 17697248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
    Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Centring ability and apical transportation after overinstrumentation with ProTaper Universal and ProFile Vortex instruments.
    González Sánchez JA; Duran-Sindreu F; de Noé S; Mercadé M; Roig M
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):542-51. PubMed ID: 22264187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Apical transportation associated with ProTaper Universal F1, F2 and F3 instruments in curved canals prepared by undergraduate students.
    Brito-Júnior M; Faria-E-Silva AL; Camilo CC; Pereira RD; Braga NM; Sousa-Neto MD
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014 Apr; 22(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 24676579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
    Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.