These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15186241)

  • 21. A comparison of LightSpeed LS1 and LightSpeed LSX NiTi rotary instruments in apical transportation and length control in simulated root canals.
    Iqbal MK; Banfield B; Lavorini A; Bachstein B
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):268-71. PubMed ID: 17320711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of air-driven vs electric torque control motors on canal centering ability by ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Zarei M; Javidi M; Erfanian M; Lomee M; Afkhami F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 23579897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An in vitro comparison of canal preparation using two automated rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques.
    Jardine SJ; Gulabivala K
    Int Endod J; 2000 Jul; 33(4):381-91. PubMed ID: 11307215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computed tomography evaluation of rotary systems on the root canal transportation and centering ability.
    Pagliosa A; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA; Raucci-Neto W; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of apical transportation and length control between EndoSequence and Guidance rotary instruments.
    Karabucak B; Gatan AJ; Hsiao C; Iqbal MK
    J Endod; 2010 Jan; 36(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 20003949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of different angles and reciprocation on the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments.
    Al-Sudani D; Kaabi H; Al Gamdi A; Al Dakheel A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 25576112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile.
    Liu SB; Fan B; Cheung GS; Peng B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Song YL; Fu Q; Bian Z
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 17212077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments in a simulated apical abrupt curvature.
    Plotino G; Grande NM; Melo MC; Bahia MG; Testarelli L; Gambarini G
    Int Endod J; 2010 Mar; 43(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 20158534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
    Paqué F; Ganahl D; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1056-9. PubMed ID: 19567334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals.
    Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 24697590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative micro-computed tomography evaluation of apical root canal transportation with the use of ProTaper, RaCe and Safesider systems in human teeth.
    Ceyhanli KT; Erdilek N; Tatar I; Cetintav B
    Aust Endod J; 2014 Apr; 40(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 24697959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of apical transportation between two rotary file systems and two hybrid rotary instrumentation sequences.
    Setzer FC; Kwon TK; Karabucak B
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1226-9. PubMed ID: 20630304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparative study of four rotary NiTi instruments in preserving canal curvature, preparation time and change of working length.
    Vahid A; Roohi N; Zayeri F
    Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 19703083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparative study of the effects of two nickel-titanium preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by microcomputed tomography.
    Loizides AL; Kakavetsos VD; Tzanetakis GN; Kontakiotis EG; Eliades G
    J Endod; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1455-9. PubMed ID: 18037058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computed tomographic evaluation of canal shape instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium systems.
    Marzouk AM; Ghoneim AG
    J Endod; 2013 Jul; 39(7):906-9. PubMed ID: 23791261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The shaping effects of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Yoshimine Y; Ono M; Akamine A
    J Endod; 2005 May; 31(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 15851932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Apical transportation during removal of root canal filling with different retreatment systems.
    Sağlam BC; Çiçek E; Koçak MM; Koçak S; Kıvanç BH
    Int J Artif Organs; 2016 Nov; 39(10):541-545. PubMed ID: 27901556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Scouting Ability of 4 Pathfinding Instruments in Moderately Curved Molar Canals.
    De-Deus G; Belladonna FG; Souza EM; Alves Vde O; Silva EJ; Rodrigues E; Versiani MA; Bueno CE
    J Endod; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1540-4. PubMed ID: 27663618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. CT evaluation of apical canal transportation associated with stainless steel hand files, oscillatory technique and pro taper rotary system.
    Hartmann MS; Fontanella VR; Vanni JR; Fornari VJ; Barletta FB
    Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 21861027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.