These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1518653)

  • 21. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
    Chotas HG; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The use of digital techniques with storage phosphors for orthopantomography. Preliminary note].
    Nessi R; Blanc M; Marzano L; Gattoni F; Weinstein R; Uslenghi C
    Radiol Med; 1992 Oct; 84(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 1455032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of a new dental panoramic radiographic system based on a tomosynthesis method.
    Ogawa K; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Noujeim M; Seki K; Okano T; Yamakawa T; Sue T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jan; 39(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 20089744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon].
    Hermann KP; Hundertmark C; Funke M; von Brenndorff A; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of diagnostic accuracy of a newly developed photofluorographic panoramic system with conventional panoramic radiography.
    Nagata Y
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 11420624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The spatial resolution of the digital storage phosphor system. The monitor and film compared].
    Nessi R; Castellana L; Paruccini N; Blanc M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 7501837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Panoramic dental radiography using a charge-coupled device receptor.
    Farman AG; Farman TT
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):166-8. PubMed ID: 9735460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detectability of normal anatomy in digital panoramic radiographs.
    Gross H; Nilsson M; Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J; 2014; 38(4):179-85. PubMed ID: 25771652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
    Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
    Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Experimental evaluation of screen-film combinations for intraoral panoramic radiography.
    Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 3470222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
    Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A new method for image layer analysis in rotational panoramic radiography.
    McDavid WD; Welander U; Morris CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Aug; 52(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 6943490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Localization of mental and mandibular foramens on the conventional and digital panoramic images.
    Peker I; Gungor K; Semiz M; Tekdemir I
    Coll Antropol; 2009 Sep; 33(3):857-62. PubMed ID: 19860115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The development of a new direct digital extra-oral radiographic system prototype using a thin-film transistor panel.
    Sakurai T; Matsuki T; Nakamura K; Kashima I; Lee DL; Cheung LK; Jeromin LS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 9693530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnostic utility of thermal printed panographs compared with corresponding computer monitor images.
    Guerrant GH; Moore WS; Murchison DF
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(2):190-6; quiz 197-8. PubMed ID: 12004700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mathematical approach to horizontal and vertical magnification factors in rotational panoramic radiography--with attention to redundant shadows.
    Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1991 Aug; 32(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 1819448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C; Ohara H
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.