BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15186761)

  • 41. Escalation, retreat, and female indifference as alternative outcomes of sexually antagonistic coevolution.
    Rowe L; Cameron E; Day T
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S5-18. PubMed ID: 15795862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Understanding the link between sexual selection, sexual conflict and aging using crickets as a model.
    Archer CR; Hunt J
    Exp Gerontol; 2015 Nov; 71():4-13. PubMed ID: 26150061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Polyandry and alternative mating tactics.
    Neff BD; Svensson EI
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2013 Mar; 368(1613):20120045. PubMed ID: 23339236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Sexual selection in complex communities: Integrating interspecific reproductive interference in structured populations.
    McDonald GC; Gardner A; Pizzari T
    Evolution; 2019 May; 73(5):1025-1036. PubMed ID: 30941751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects.
    Arnqvist G; Edvardsson M; Friberg U; Nilsson T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2000 Sep; 97(19):10460-4. PubMed ID: 10984538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Monogamy and the battle of the sexes.
    Hosken DJ; Stockley P; Tregenza T; Wedell N
    Annu Rev Entomol; 2009; 54():361-78. PubMed ID: 18793102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Gamete traits influence the variance in reproductive success, the intensity of sexual selection, and the outcome of sexual conflict among congeneric sea urchins.
    Levitan DR
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1305-16. PubMed ID: 18363865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Quantitative genetic models of sexual conflict based on interacting phenotypes.
    Moore AJ; Pizzari T
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S88-97. PubMed ID: 15795865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Detecting sexually antagonistic coevolution with population crosses.
    Rowe L; Cameron E; Day T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Oct; 270(1528):2009-16. PubMed ID: 14561288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Male-female conflict and genitalia: failure to confirm predictions in insects and spiders.
    Eberhard WG
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2004 Feb; 79(1):121-86. PubMed ID: 15005176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reproductive biology: direct delivery of costly sex peptides.
    Gage MJ
    Curr Biol; 2005 Feb; 15(4):R124-6. PubMed ID: 15723781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sexual selection for male dominance reduces opportunities for female mate choice in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus).
    Reichard M; Bryja J; Ondracková M; Dávidová M; Kaniewska P; Smith C
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Apr; 14(5):1533-42. PubMed ID: 15813791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Exploring the consequences of postmating-prezygotic interactions between the sexes.
    Knowles LL; Hernandez BB; Markow TA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Aug; 271 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S357-9. PubMed ID: 15504017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mortality costs of sexual selection and parental care in natural populations of birds.
    Liker A; Székely T
    Evolution; 2005 Apr; 59(4):890-7. PubMed ID: 15926698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Animal behaviour: relative size in the mating game.
    Andersson M; Wallander J
    Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7005):139-41. PubMed ID: 15356614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sexual conflict and speciation.
    Tregenza T; Butlin RK; Wedell N
    Nature; 2000 Sep; 407(6801):149-50. PubMed ID: 11001043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Adaptive male effects on female ageing in seed beetles.
    Maklakov AA; Kremer N; Arnqvist G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Dec; 272(1580):2485-9. PubMed ID: 16271973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Experimental evidence that sexual conflict influences the opportunity, form and intensity of sexual selection.
    Hall MD; Bussière LF; Hunt J; Brooks R
    Evolution; 2008 Sep; 62(9):2305-15. PubMed ID: 18540949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Sexually dimorphic levels of color trait integration and the resolution of sexual conflict in Lake Malawi cichlids.
    Brzozowski F; Roscoe J; Parsons K; Albertson C
    J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2012 Jun; 318(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 22821863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.