These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15186982)

  • 1. The relationship between estimates of foreperiod duration and simple time reaction.
    Buckolz E; Rugins O
    J Mot Behav; 1978 Sep; 10(3):211-21. PubMed ID: 15186982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revisiting variable-foreperiod effects: evaluating the repetition priming account.
    Han T; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1193-1207. PubMed ID: 35391659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sequential Effects of Foreperiod Duration as a function of the Frequency of Foreperiod Repetitions.
    Alegria J
    J Mot Behav; 1975 Dec; 7(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 23965020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of foreperiod duration on reaction time and its relation to interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Keller JV; Van Der Schoot F
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 Jul; 30(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 16812084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Weakness and instability of time expectancy in schizophrenia.
    Mo SS; Kersey R; Huang DD
    J Clin Psychol; 1978 Jan; 34(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 641179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preparing the heart, eye, and brain: foreperiod length effects in a nonaging paradigm.
    Jennings JR; van der Molen MW; Steinhauer SR
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Jan; 35(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 9499710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of response complexity on simple reaction time occurs even with a highly predictable imperative stimulus.
    Maslovat D; Klapp ST; Forgaard CJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jun; 704():62-66. PubMed ID: 30946926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reaction time changes with the hazard rate for a behaviorally relevant event when monkeys perform a delayed wrist movement task.
    Tsunoda Y; Kakei S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 18243554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lengthening fixed preparatory foreperiod durations within a digit magnitude classification task serves mainly to shift distributions of response times upwards.
    Leth-Steensen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 19041084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A priori probability effects on simple reaction time.
    Buckolz E; Wilberg R
    J Mot Behav; 1975 Mar; 7(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 23961894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reversible inactivations of rat medial prefrontal cortex impair the ability to wait for a stimulus.
    Narayanan NS; Horst NK; Laubach M
    Neuroscience; 2006; 139(3):865-76. PubMed ID: 16500029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural modulation by regularity and passage of time.
    Correa A; Nobre AC
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1649-55. PubMed ID: 18632896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transfer effects in auditory temporal preparation occur using an unfilled but not filled foreperiod.
    Crowe EM; Los SA; Schindler L; Kent C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Aug; 74(8):1432-1438. PubMed ID: 33535929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The specificity of temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Wagener A; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Dec; 64(12):2289-300. PubMed ID: 21970615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks.
    Los SA; Horoufchin H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 21213194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Foreperiod length, but not memory, affects human reaction time in a precued, delayed response.
    Mohagheghi AA; Anson JG; Hyland BI; Parr-Brownlie L; Wickens JR
    Motor Control; 1998 Apr; 2(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 9644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of a neutral warning signal under increased temporal uncertainty.
    Han T; Proctor RW
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1346-1357. PubMed ID: 36811693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pupillary fluctuation amplitude preceding target presentation is linked to the variable foreperiod effect on reaction time in Psychomotor Vigilance Tasks.
    Yamashita J; Terashima H; Yoneya M; Maruya K; Oishi H; Kumada T
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0276205. PubMed ID: 36264952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociating temporal preparation processes as a function of the inter-trial interval duration.
    Vallesi A; Lozano VN; Correa A
    Cognition; 2013 Apr; 127(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 23318351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2309-22. PubMed ID: 21755419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.