These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15186984)

  • 1. Reaction time and probability on isolated terms.
    Gottsdanker R; Kent K
    J Mot Behav; 1978 Sep; 10(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 15186984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reaction Time of Erroneous Responses in the Go/No-Go Paradigm.
    Leblanc-Sirois Y; Braun CMJ; Elie-Fortier J
    Exp Psychol; 2018 Sep; 65(5):314-321. PubMed ID: 30451107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of preparation time and trial type probability on performance of anti- and pro-saccades.
    Pierce JE; McDowell JE
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():188-94. PubMed ID: 26829023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Operant conditioning of behavioral variability using a percentile reinforcement schedule.
    Machado A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Sep; 52(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 2794841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The trajectory of the target probability effect.
    Hon N; Yap MJ; Jabar SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 May; 75(4):661-6. PubMed ID: 23404522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of tachistoscopically exposed symmetrical and asymmetrical letter arrays.
    Fudin R; Garcia M; Solomon NA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Aug; 41(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 1178390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trial-type probability and task-switching effects on behavioral response characteristics in a mixed saccade task.
    Pierce JE; McCardel JB; McDowell JE
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 233(3):959-69. PubMed ID: 25537465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extended LATER model can account for trial-by-trial variability of both pre- and post-processes.
    Nakahara H; Nakamura K; Hikosaka O
    Neural Netw; 2006 Oct; 19(8):1027-46. PubMed ID: 16971090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting placebo response in adolescents with major depressive disorder: The Adolescent Placebo Impact Composite Score (APICS).
    Nakonezny PA; Mayes TL; Byerly MJ; Emslie GJ
    J Psychiatr Res; 2015 Sep; 68():346-53. PubMed ID: 26028546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of autoshaping in cooperative two-player games between starlings.
    Reboreda JC; Kacelnik A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jul; 60(1):67-83. PubMed ID: 16812699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lung cancer probability in patients with CT-detected pulmonary nodules: a prespecified analysis of data from the NELSON trial of low-dose CT screening.
    Horeweg N; van Rosmalen J; Heuvelmans MA; van der Aalst CM; Vliegenthart R; Scholten ET; ten Haaf K; Nackaerts K; Lammers JW; Weenink C; Groen HJ; van Ooijen P; de Jong PA; de Bock GH; Mali W; de Koning HJ; Oudkerk M
    Lancet Oncol; 2014 Nov; 15(12):1332-41. PubMed ID: 25282285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential effects in naming: a time-criterion account.
    Taylor TE; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jan; 27(1):117-38. PubMed ID: 11204093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. P300-based Stroop study with low probability and target Stroop oddballs: the evidence still favors the response selection hypothesis.
    Rosenfeld JP; Skogsberg KR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jun; 60(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 16102861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of stimulus probability on encoding by mentally retarded and nonretarded persons.
    Maisto AA; Sipe S
    Am J Ment Defic; 1980 May; 84(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 7377229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aging and the use of advance probability information.
    Gottsdanker R
    J Mot Behav; 1980 Jun; 12(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 15215058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing palpation thresholds of osteopathic medical students using static models of the lumbar spine.
    Snider EJ; Pamperin K; Johnson JC; Shurtz NR; Degenhardt BF
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Jun; 114(6):460-9. PubMed ID: 24917633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized trial of a brief intervention for obesity in college students.
    Buscemi J; Yurasek AM; Dennhardt AA; Martens MP; Murphy JG
    Clin Obes; 2011 Aug; 1(4-6):131-40. PubMed ID: 25585901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Decision strategy: effect of probability of the results and of the allowed time on choice reaction time and on movement time].
    Proteau L; Laurencelle L
    Can J Appl Sport Sci; 1983 Jun; 8(2):54-62. PubMed ID: 6883614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anodal tDCS over SMA decreases the probability of withholding an anticipated action.
    Hayduk-Costa G; Drummond NM; Carlsen AN
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 257():208-14. PubMed ID: 24064279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.
    Johnston V; Liberato S; Thomas D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Oct; 10():CD008645. PubMed ID: 23076949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.