These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15189554)

  • 1. 'Double b(l)ind': Peer-review and the politics of scholarship.
    Walker K
    Nurs Philos; 2004 Jul; 5(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 15189554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nurse editors' views on the peer review process.
    Kearney MH; Freda MC
    Res Nurs Health; 2005 Dec; 28(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 16287058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On ethical peer review and publication: the importance of professional conduct and communication.
    Spear HJ
    Nurse Author Ed; 2004; 14(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 15551686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
    Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.
    Jacobson AF; Schmidt K; Coeling H
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(1):1-4, 7. PubMed ID: 15739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nursing and the art of radical critique.
    Rolfe G
    Nurse Educ Today; 2008 Jan; 28(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17412459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
    Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication.
    Pierson DJ
    Respir Care; 2004 Oct; 49(10):1246-52. PubMed ID: 15447812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bibliometrics as politics: the case of emerging disciplines.
    Traynor M
    Int Nurs Rev; 2011 Mar; 58(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 21281289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scholarship in nursing: what really counts?
    El-Masri MM; Fox-Wasylyshyn SM
    Nurse Res; 2006; 13(4):79-80. PubMed ID: 16897943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
    Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. More about peer review: is it time for double-blind reviews?
    Klein JR
    Nat Immunol; 2001 Oct; 2(10):892. PubMed ID: 11577338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer-reviewed publication output of psychiatric nurses in the Republic of Ireland.
    Higgins A; Farrelly M
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2007 Aug; 14(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 17635258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reviewing a manuscript for publication: how do I do this?
    Koop PP
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 10703301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer-review and publication of research protocols and proposals: a role for open access journals.
    Eysenbach G
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Sep; 6(3):e37. PubMed ID: 15471763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The research advisory committee: an effective forum for developing a research dynamic environment.
    Howland L; Sullivan-Bolyai S; Bova C; Klar R; Harper D; Schilling L
    J Prof Nurs; 2008; 24(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 18662660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reviewers support blinding in peer review.
    Tierney AJ
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):113. PubMed ID: 18990091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Humanism and its critiques in nursing research literature.
    Traynor M
    J Adv Nurs; 2009 Jul; 65(7):1560-7. PubMed ID: 19291188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.