These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15189620)

  • 21. Further validation of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction.
    Byers ES; MacNeil S
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2006; 32(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 16234226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An evolutionary perspective on humor: sexual selection or interest indication?
    Li NP; Griskevicius V; Durante KM; Jonason PK; Pasisz DJ; Aumer K
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jul; 35(7):923-36. PubMed ID: 19407005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exploring Links Between Online Infidelity, Mate Poaching Intentions, and the Likelihood of Meeting Offline.
    Sharabi LL; Uhlich M; Alexopoulos C; Timmermans E
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2021 Jul; 24(7):450-456. PubMed ID: 34171960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing implicit mate preferences among Chinese and Japanese women by providing love, sex, or money cues.
    Jin Z; Shiomura K; Jiang L
    Psychol Rep; 2015 Feb; 116(1):195-206. PubMed ID: 25588065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of humor on interpersonal attraction and mate selection.
    McGee E; Shevlin M
    J Psychol; 2009 Jan; 143(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 19157073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceived Mate Scarcity Leads to Increased Willingness to Mate Poach.
    McKelvie L; Locke A; Albert G; Minor M; MacKinnon M; Hodges-Simeon C; Arnocky S
    J Sex Res; 2023; 60(3):409-417. PubMed ID: 34859726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Emotional and sexual infidelity offline and in cyberspace.
    Whitty MT; Quigley LL
    J Marital Fam Ther; 2008 Oct; 34(4):461-8. PubMed ID: 19017185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Women's preferences for sexual dimorphism in height depend on menstrual cycle phase and expected duration of relationship.
    Pawlowski B; Jasienska G
    Biol Psychol; 2005 Sep; 70(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 16038772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Romantic involvement often reduces men's testosterone levels--but not always: the moderating role of extrapair sexual interest.
    McIntyre M; Gangestad SW; Gray PB; Chapman JF; Burnham TC; O'Rourke MT; Thornhill R
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Oct; 91(4):642-51. PubMed ID: 17014290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relationship dealbreakers: traits people avoid in potential mates.
    Jonason PK; Garcia JR; Webster GD; Li NP; Fisher HE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Dec; 41(12):1697-711. PubMed ID: 26445853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The siren's call: terror management and the threat of men's sexual attraction to women.
    Landau MJ; Goldenberg JL; Greenberg J; Gillath O; Solomon S; Cox C; Martens A; Pyszczynski T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):129-46. PubMed ID: 16448314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sex and generational differences in desired characteristics in mate selection.
    Amador J; Charles T; Tait J; Helm HW
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Feb; 96(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15825900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The neural basis of individual differences in mate poaching.
    Ueda R; Ashida H; Yanagisawa K; Abe N
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 12(4):391-399. PubMed ID: 27109897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A meta-analysis of sex differences in romantic attraction: do rating contexts moderate tactic effectiveness judgments?
    Schmitt DP
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2002 Sep; 41(Pt 3):387-402. PubMed ID: 12419009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What leads to romantic attraction: similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study.
    Luo S; Zhang G
    J Pers; 2009 Aug; 77(4):933-64. PubMed ID: 19558447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Meeting your match: how attractiveness similarity affects approach behavior in mixed-sex dyads.
    van Straaten I; Engels RC; Finkenauer C; Holland RW
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jun; 35(6):685-97. PubMed ID: 19336540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Peacocks, Picasso, and parental investment: The effects of romantic motives on creativity.
    Griskevicius V; Cialdini RB; Kenrick DT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jul; 91(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 16834480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Obsessive-compulsive disorder and romantic functioning.
    Abbey RD; Clopton JR; Humphreys JD
    J Clin Psychol; 2007 Dec; 63(12):1181-92. PubMed ID: 17972290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Westermarck, Freud, and the incest taboo: does familial resemblance activate sexual attraction?
    Fraley RC; Marks MJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1202-12. PubMed ID: 20647594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Once a Poacher Always a Poacher? Mate Poaching History and its Association with Relationship Quality.
    Belu CF; O'Sullivan LF
    J Sex Res; 2020 May; 57(4):508-521. PubMed ID: 31106590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.