These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15190695)

  • 1. A computer program for Spearman-Kärber and probit analysis of psychometric function data.
    Miller J; Ulrich R
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Feb; 36(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 15190695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the analysis of psychometric functions: the Spearman-Kärber method.
    Miller J; Ulrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1399-420. PubMed ID: 11800465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Threshold estimation in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks: the Spearman-Kärber method.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Apr; 66(3):517-33. PubMed ID: 15283075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Slope bias of psychometric functions derived from adaptive data.
    Kaernbach C
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1389-98. PubMed ID: 11800464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of optimal data placement for psychometric function estimation: a computer simulation.
    Lam CF; Dubno JR; Mills JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1969-76. PubMed ID: 10530021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary.
    Klein SA
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1421-55. PubMed ID: 11800466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sampling plans for fitting the psychometric function.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 8(2):256-89. PubMed ID: 16255393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive threshold estimation with unforced-choice tasks.
    Kaernbach C
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1377-88. PubMed ID: 11800463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.
    Wichmann FA; Hill NJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1293-313. PubMed ID: 11800458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance metrics for an application-driven selection and optimization of psychophysical sampling procedures.
    Rinderknecht MD; Lambercy O; Gassert R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207217. PubMed ID: 30485350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonparametric tests for equality of psychometric functions.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón V
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2226-2255. PubMed ID: 29218586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signal detection theory and vestibular perception: III. Estimating unbiased fit parameters for psychometric functions.
    Chaudhuri SE; Merfeld DM
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 225(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 23250442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: a reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009).
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1155-78. PubMed ID: 20436208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum-likelihood psychometric procedures in two-alternative forced-choice: evaluation and recommendations.
    Madigan R; Williams D
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Sep; 42(3):240-9. PubMed ID: 3671049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confidence intervals for the parameters of psychometric functions.
    Maloney LT
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 2304811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical performance of optimal Bayesian adaptive estimation.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2009 May; 12(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 19476214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Painfree and accurate Bayesian estimation of psychometric functions for (potentially) overdispersed data.
    Schütt HH; Harmeling S; Macke JH; Wichmann FA
    Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():105-123. PubMed ID: 27013261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian adaptive estimation of arbitrary points on a psychometric function.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):147-74. PubMed ID: 17535585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using the standard staircase to measure the point of subjective equality: a guide based on computer simulations.
    Meese TS
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Apr; 57(3):267-81. PubMed ID: 7770319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.