These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15190695)

  • 21. Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function.
    Strasburger H
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1348-55. PubMed ID: 11800461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The psi-marginal adaptive method: How to give nuisance parameters the attention they deserve (no more, no less).
    Prins N
    J Vis; 2013 Jun; 13(7):3. PubMed ID: 23750016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. SQAB 2005: complexity and generalizability.
    Grace RC; Marr MJ
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 16621336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Trial-dependent psychometric functions accounting for perceptual learning in 2-AFC discrimination tasks.
    Kattner F; Cochrane A; Green CS
    J Vis; 2017 Sep; 17(11):3. PubMed ID: 28877536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling.
    Wichmann FA; Hill NJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1314-29. PubMed ID: 11800459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Slope of psychometric functions and termination rule analysis for low contrast acuity charts.
    Carkeet A; Bailey IL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):118-127. PubMed ID: 28211180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Order effects in two-alternative forced-choice tasks invalidate adaptive threshold estimates.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Oct; 52(5):2168-2187. PubMed ID: 32232736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Shifts in the psychophysical function in rats.
    Guilhardi P; Macinnis ML; Church RM; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 17360131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Study of Rasch, partial credit, and rating scale model parameter recovery in WINSTEPS and jMetrik.
    Meyer JP; Hailey E
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 23234828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using logistic regression to estimate delay-discounting functions.
    Wileyto EP; Audrain-McGovern J; Epstein LH; Lerman C
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Feb; 36(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 15190698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation.
    King-Smith PE; Grigsby SS; Vingrys AJ; Benes SC; Supowit A
    Vision Res; 1994 Apr; 34(7):885-912. PubMed ID: 8160402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. GGUMLINK: a computer program to link parameter estimates of the generalized graded unfolding model from item response theory.
    Roberts JS; Huang CW
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 Nov; 35(4):525-36. PubMed ID: 14748497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recovering stimuli from memory: a statistical method for linking discrimination and reproduction responses.
    Vevea JL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):321-46. PubMed ID: 17067415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Inference for psychometric functions in the presence of nonstationary behavior.
    Fründ I; Haenel NV; Wichmann FA
    J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 21606382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Matlab function to estimate choice model parameters from paired-comparison data.
    Wickelmaier F; Schmid C
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Feb; 36(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 15190697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. DLs in reminder and 2AFC tasks: data and models.
    Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1179-98. PubMed ID: 20436209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of adaptive psychometric procedures motivated by the theory of optimal experiments: simulated and experimental results.
    Remus JJ; Collins LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):315-26. PubMed ID: 18177161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Invariance of the psychometric function for character recognition across the visual field.
    Strasburger H
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1356-76. PubMed ID: 11800462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Experience with a yes-no single-interval maximum-likelihood procedure.
    Leek MR; Dubno JR; He N; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2674-84. PubMed ID: 10830389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Two-stage model for order discrimination.
    Jaśkowski P
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jul; 50(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 1881768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.