BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15191098)

  • 21. Pain-preventing strategies in mammography: an observational study of simultaneously recorded pain and breast mechanics throughout the entire breast compression cycle.
    de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Grimbergen CA; den Heeten GJ
    BMC Womens Health; 2015; 15():26. PubMed ID: 25783657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does the use of self-compression in mammography affect compression force, breast thickness, and mean glandular dose?
    Alukic E; Bravhar P; Mekis N
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jun; 139():109694. PubMed ID: 33839429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Breast compression in mammography: pressure distribution patterns.
    Dustler M; Andersson I; Brorson H; Fröjd P; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S; Förnvik D
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Nov; 53(9):973-80. PubMed ID: 22949732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mammography in females with an implanted medical device: impact on image quality, pain and anxiety.
    Paap E; Witjes M; van Landsveld-Verhoeven C; Pijnappel RM; Maas AH; Broeders MJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160142. PubMed ID: 27452263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast compression and reported pain during mammographic screening.
    Moshina N; Sagstad S; Sebuødegård S; Waade GG; Gran E; Music J; Hofvind S
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):133-139. PubMed ID: 32052779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography.
    Balleyguier C; Cousin M; Dunant A; Attard M; Delaloge S; Arfi-Rouche J
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 103():137-142. PubMed ID: 30223227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mammographic compression after breast conserving therapy: controlling pressure instead of force.
    de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Branderhorst W; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):023501. PubMed ID: 24506652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Mammography-related pain and anxiety].
    Alimoğlu E; Alimoğlu MK; Kabaalioğlu A; Ceken K; Apaydin A; Lüleci E
    Tani Girisim Radyol; 2004 Sep; 10(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 15470624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography.
    Miller D; Martin I; Herbison P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (4):CD002942. PubMed ID: 12519579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Experience of pain during mammographic screening by three different compression paddles.
    Moshina N; Sagstad S; Holen ÅS; Backmann HA; Westermann LC; Hofvind S
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 Aug; 29(5):903-910. PubMed ID: 37453253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pain during mammography: impact of breast pathologies and demographic factors.
    Gupta R; Nayak M; Khoursheed M; Roy S; Behbehani AI
    Med Princ Pract; 2003; 12(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 12766337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mammography-related breast pain is associated with migraine.
    Mattsson P
    Cephalalgia; 2009 Jun; 29(6):616-23. PubMed ID: 19175612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mammographic compression practices of force- and pressure-standardisation protocol: A scoping review.
    Serwan E; Matthews D; Davies J; Chau M
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Sep; 67(3):233-242. PubMed ID: 32420700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pressure-standardised mammography does not affect visibility, contrast and sharpness of stable lesions.
    de Groot JE; Hopman IGM; van Lier MGJTB; Branderhorst W; Grimbergen CA; den Heeten GJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():289-295. PubMed ID: 28027762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The impact of compression force and pressure at prevalent screening on subsequent re-attendance in a national screening program.
    Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Holen ÅS; Waade GG; Tsuruda K; Hofvind S
    Prev Med; 2018 Mar; 108():129-136. PubMed ID: 29337068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Technical Note: Validation of two methods to determine contact area between breast and compression paddle in mammography.
    Branderhorst W; de Groot JE; van Lier MGJTB; Highnam RP; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4040-4044. PubMed ID: 28569996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Compression in mammography and the perception of discomfort.
    Poulos A; Rickard M
    Australas Radiol; 1997 Aug; 41(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 9293675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pain experienced by women attending breast cancer screening.
    Keemers-Gels ME; Groenendijk RP; van den Heuvel JH; Boetes C; Peer PG; Wobbes TH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2000 Apr; 60(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 10930111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.