281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15191279)
1. A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography.
Timp S; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):958-71. PubMed ID: 15191279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast mass segmentation in mammography using plane fitting and dynamic programming.
Song E; Jiang L; Jin R; Zhang L; Yuan Y; Li Q
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):826-35. PubMed ID: 19362024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided diagnosis of solid breast nodules: use of an artificial neural network based on multiple sonographic features.
Joo S; Yang YS; Moon WK; Kim HC
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1292-300. PubMed ID: 15493696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computerized characterization of breast masses on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski LM; Ramachandran A; Paramagul C; LeCarpentier GL; Nees A; Blane C
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):744-54. PubMed ID: 15124991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.
Jalalian A; Mashohor SB; Mahmud HR; Saripan MI; Ramli AR; Karasfi B
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 23153689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radial gradient-based segmentation of mammographic microcalcifications: observer evaluation and effect on CAD performance.
Paquerault S; Yarusso LM; Papaioannou J; Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 15487748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images.
Moon WK; Shen YW; Huang CS; Chiang LR; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):539-48. PubMed ID: 21420580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast mass contour segmentation algorithm in digital mammograms.
Berber T; Alpkocak A; Balci P; Dicle O
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 May; 110(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 23273502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new automated method for the segmentation and characterization of breast masses on ultrasound images.
Cui J; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Nees A; Paramagul C; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Shi J
Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1553-65. PubMed ID: 19544771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics.
Chen W; Giger ML; Lan L; Bick U
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1076-82. PubMed ID: 15191295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining low-, high-level and empirical domain knowledge for automated segmentation of ultrasonic breast lesions.
Madabhushi A; Metaxas DN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12715992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
Lauria A
Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in MR-mammography (MRM): do we really need whole lesion time curve distribution analysis?
Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Kullnig PE; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19268855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
