159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15191280)
1. An automated procedure for the quality assurance of electron beam output and energy.
Woo MK; Videla NG
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):972-4. PubMed ID: 15191280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proposed definitions for isodose flatness and symmetry in clinical radiotherapy beams.
Galiano E; Joly T; Wiebe F
Appl Radiat Isot; 2004 Dec; 61(6):1361-6. PubMed ID: 15388134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Introducing a system for automated control of rotation axes, collimator and laser adjustment for a medical linear accelerator.
Winkler P; Bergmann H; Stuecklschweiger G; Guss H
Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1123-32. PubMed ID: 12765326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Linear accelerator output variability.
Luketina IA; Greig L
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Sep; 27(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 15580846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Commissioning and acceptance testing of a CyberKnife linear accelerator.
Sharma SC; Ott JT; Williams JB; Dickow D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 8(3):119-125. PubMed ID: 17712305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine performance check (MPC) beam constancy checks for flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams.
Barnes MP; Greer PB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):139-150. PubMed ID: 28291921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An empirical method for the determination of wall perturbation factors for parallel-plate chambers in high-energy electron beams.
McEwen M; Palmans H; Williams A
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5167-81. PubMed ID: 17019031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factor 10 Expedience of Monthly Linac Quality Assurance via an Ion Chamber Array and Automation Scripts.
Skinner LB; Yang Y; Hsu A; Xing L; Yu AS; Niedermayr T
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019; 18():1533033819876897. PubMed ID: 31707931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose properties of a laser accelerated electron beam and prospects for clinical application.
Kainz KK; Hogstrom KR; Antolak JA; Almond PR; Bloch CD; Chiu C; Fomytskyi M; Raischel F; Downer M; Tajima T
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2053-67. PubMed ID: 15305458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of photostimulable phosphor systems for periodic quality assurance in radiotherapy.
Conte L; Bianchi C; Cassani E; Monciardini M; Mordacchini C; Novario R; Strocchi S; Stucchi P; Tanzi F
Phys Med; 2008 Mar; 24(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 18178116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of alanine for dosimetry intercomparisons among Italian radiotherapy centers.
De Angelis C; De Coste V; Fattibene P; Onori S; Petetti E
Appl Radiat Isot; 2005 Feb; 62(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 15607459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The linear accelerator mechanical and radiation isocentre assessment with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID).
Liu G; van Doorn T; Bezak E
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Sep; 27(3):111-7. PubMed ID: 15580840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation of properties of the TIARA neutron beam facility of importance for calibration applications.
Shikaze Y; Tanimura Y; Saegusa J; Tsutsumi M; Yamaguchi Y; Uchita Y
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):163-7. PubMed ID: 17519243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical note: output and energy fluctuations of the tomotherapy Hi-Art helical tomotherapy system.
Mahan SL; Chase DJ; Ramsey CR
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2119-20. PubMed ID: 15305465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ion recombination correction in the Clatterbridge Centre of Oncology clinical proton beam.
Palmans H; Thomas R; Kacperek A
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(4):903-17. PubMed ID: 16467586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of routine quality assurance procedures to detect the loss of a linear accelerator primary scattering foil.
Davis MG; Nyerick CE; Horton JL; Hogstrom KR
Med Phys; 1996 Apr; 23(4):521-2. PubMed ID: 9157264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the effect of an error in a standard D2O-moderated 252Cf energy spectrum.
Cummings FM
Health Phys; 2009 Dec; 97(6):628-9. PubMed ID: 19901598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A pulse-rate dependence of dose per monitor unit and its significant effect on wedged-shaped fields delivered with variable dose rate and a moving jaw.
Faddegon BA; Garde E
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3063-5. PubMed ID: 16964884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Calibration of a proton beam energy monitor.
Moyers MF; Coutrakon GB; Ghebremedhin A; Shahnazi K; Koss P; Sanders E
Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):1952-66. PubMed ID: 17654898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using ion chambers with wedge-shaped absorbers for electron energy measurements.
Johnsen SW
Med Phys; 1986; 13(2):257-8. PubMed ID: 3702824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
