344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15191306)
1. Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.
Hunt DC; Tousignant O; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1166-75. PubMed ID: 15191306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiotherapy: image quality and dose measurements.
Cremers F; Frenzel T; Kausch C; Albers D; Schönborn T; Schmidt R
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):985-96. PubMed ID: 15191282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.
Zhao W; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital x-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: reduction of aliasing.
Ji WG; Zhao W; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 1998 Nov; 25(11):2148-62. PubMed ID: 9829239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications.
Granfors PR; Aufrichtig R
Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1324-31. PubMed ID: 10902562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: construction and evaluation of a prototype real-time detector.
Zhao W; Blevis I; Germann S; Rowlands JA; Waechter D; Huang Z
Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1834-43. PubMed ID: 9434966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.
Borasi G; Nitrosi A; Ferrari P; Tassoni D
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1719-31. PubMed ID: 12906189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
Samant SS; Gopal A
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications.
Granfors PR; Aufrichtig R; Possin GE; Giambattista BW; Huang ZS; Liu J; Ma B
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2715-26. PubMed ID: 14596310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography.
Elbakri IA; Tesic MM; Xiong Q
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 17404462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-resolution imager for digital mammography: physical characterization of a prototype sensor.
Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Vedantham S; Onishi SK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3957-69. PubMed ID: 16177523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
Samant SS; Gopal A
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector.
Saunders RS; Samei E; Jesneck JL; Lo JY
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):588-99. PubMed ID: 15789606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the effects of pixel loss on image quality in direct digital radiography.
Padgett R; Kotre CJ
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(6):977-86. PubMed ID: 15104320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
