These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15191308)

  • 1. Porous phantoms for PET and SPECT performance evaluation and quality assurance.
    DiFilippo FP; Price JP; Kelsch DN; Muzic RF
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1183-94. PubMed ID: 15191308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system.
    Seo Y; Wong KH; Sun M; Franc BL; Hawkins RA; Hasegawa BH
    J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 15872362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An inter-laboratory comparison study of image quality of PET scanners using the NEMA NU 2-2001 procedure for assessment of image quality.
    Bergmann H; Dobrozemsky G; Minear G; Nicoletti R; Samal M
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(10):2193-207. PubMed ID: 15876661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A dual modality approach to quantitative quality control in emission tomography.
    Thomas MD; Bailey DL; Livieratos L
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):N187-94. PubMed ID: 16030376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of MR surface coils on PET quantification in whole-body PET/MR: results from a pseudo-PET/MR phantom study.
    Tellmann L; Quick HH; Bockisch A; Herzog H; Beyer T
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2795-805. PubMed ID: 21776816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of the quantitative PET prostate phantom (Q3P) for improved quality assurance of
    Fedrigo R; Coope R; Rahmim A; Bénard F; Uribe CF
    Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 51(6):4311-4323. PubMed ID: 38348927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of PET and SPECT phantom image quality through automated binary classification of cold rod arrays.
    DiFilippo FP
    Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3451-3461. PubMed ID: 31115055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design and simulation of a full-ring multi-lofthole collimator for brain SPECT.
    Van Audenhaege K; Vandenberghe S; Deprez K; Vandeghinste B; Van Holen R
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6317-36. PubMed ID: 23966017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitatively accurate activity measurements with a dedicated cardiac SPECT camera: Physical phantom experiments.
    Pourmoghaddas A; Wells RG
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):44. PubMed ID: 26745898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of GATE Monte Carlo simulations of the GE Advance/Discovery LS PET scanners.
    Schmidtlein CR; Kirov AS; Nehmeh SA; Erdi YE; Humm JL; Amols HI; Bidaut LM; Ganin A; Stearns CW; McDaniel DL; Hamacher KA
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):198-208. PubMed ID: 16485426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of different contributions of scatter and attenuation on the threshold values in contrast-based algorithms for volume segmentation.
    Matheoud R; Della Monica P; Secco C; Loi G; Krengli M; Inglese E; Brambilla M
    Phys Med; 2011 Jan; 27(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 20399128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative evaluation on [⁹⁰Y] DOTATOC PET and SPECT imaging by phantom acquisitions and clinical applications in locoregional and systemic treatments.
    Fabbri C; Mattone V; Casi M; De Lauro F; Agostini M; Bartolini N; D'arienzo M; Marchi G; Bartolomei M; Sarti G
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Dec; 56(6):522-8. PubMed ID: 23358405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A fillable micro-hollow sphere lesion detection phantom using superposition.
    Difilippo FP; Gallo SL; Klatte RS; Patel S
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(18):5363-81. PubMed ID: 20736497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo simulation of PET and SPECT imaging of 90Y.
    Takahashi A; Himuro K; Yamashita Y; Komiya I; Baba S; Sasaki M
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1926-35. PubMed ID: 25832083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-camera comparison of SPECT measurements of a 3-D anthropomorphic basal ganglia phantom.
    Koch W; Radau PE; Münzing W; Tatsch K
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Apr; 33(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 16435116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of motion on tracer activity determination in CT attenuation corrected PET images: a lung phantom study.
    Pevsner A; Nehmeh SA; Humm JL; Mageras GS; Erdi YE
    Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2358-62. PubMed ID: 16121593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of cold walls on PET image quantification and volume segmentation: a phantom study.
    Berthon B; Marshall C; Edwards A; Evans M; Spezi E
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082505. PubMed ID: 23927350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. UK audit of single photon emission computed tomography reconstruction software using software generated phantoms.
    Jarritt PH; Whalley DR; Skrypniuk JV; Houston AS; Fleming JS; Cosgriff PS
    Nucl Med Commun; 2002 May; 23(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 11973490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.
    Bettinardi V; Presotto L; Rapisarda E; Picchio M; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5394-411. PubMed ID: 21992359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Monte Carlo and physical phantom evaluation of quantitative In-111 SPECT.
    He B; Du Y; Song X; Segars WP; Frey EC
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4169-85. PubMed ID: 16177538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.