These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15191321)

  • 1. Classification of mammographic masses using generalized dynamic fuzzy neural networks.
    Lim WK; Er MJ
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1288-95. PubMed ID: 15191321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
    Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
    Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses.
    Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams GS; Lu AH; Wallace LP; Maitz GS; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3135-43. PubMed ID: 17022205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal change analysis for characterization of mass lesions in mammography.
    Timp S; Varela C; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(7):945-53. PubMed ID: 17649908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving performance of computer-aided detection scheme by combining results from two machine learning classifiers.
    Park SC; Pu J; Zheng B
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):266-74. PubMed ID: 19201355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
    Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images.
    Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí J; Pérez E; Pont J; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):87-110. PubMed ID: 20071209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
    Lauria A
    Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic masses using scalable image retrieval.
    Jiang M; Zhang S; Li H; Metaxas DN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Feb; 62(2):783-92. PubMed ID: 25361497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
    Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer aided detection of masses in mammography using subregion Hotelling observers.
    Baydush AH; Catarious DM; Abbey CK; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1781-7. PubMed ID: 12906196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rule-based fuzzy classifier for spinal deformities.
    Birtane S; Korkmaz H
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3311-9. PubMed ID: 25227041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of intelligent systems based on Bayesian regularization network and neuro-fuzzy models for mass detection in mammograms: A comparative analysis.
    Mahersia H; Boulehmi H; Hamrouni K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():46-62. PubMed ID: 26831269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
    Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of likelihood ratio to classification of mammographic masses; performance comparison to case-based reasoning.
    Bilska-Wolak AO; Floyd CE; Nolte LW; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2003 May; 30(5):949-58. PubMed ID: 12773004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography.
    Timp S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):958-71. PubMed ID: 15191279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.