223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15191328)
1. Speech perception benefits of FM and infrared devices to children with hearing aids in a typical classroom.
Anderson KL; Goldstein H
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2004 Apr; 35(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 15191328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech recognition abilities of adults using cochlear implants with FM systems.
Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2004; 15(10):678-91. PubMed ID: 15646666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech Perception in Classroom Acoustics by Children With Hearing Loss and Wearing Hearing Aids.
Iglehart F
Am J Audiol; 2020 Mar; 29(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 31835909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech perception by students with cochlear implants using sound-field systems in classrooms.
Iglehart F
Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 15248805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of FM system fitted into normal hearing ear on speech-in-noise recognition in Japanese school-aged children with unilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss.
Shimada A; Udaka J; Nagashima H; Chiba I; Kondo E; Nakano S; Okamoto H; Takeda N
J Med Invest; 2018; 65(3.4):216-220. PubMed ID: 30282863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experiments with classroom FM amplification.
Boothroyd A; Iglehart F
Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):202-17. PubMed ID: 9657595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Battles J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recognition performance for four combinations of FM system and hearing aid microphone signals in adverse listening conditions.
Pittman AL; Lewis DE; Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG
Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10466564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Benefit of Remote Microphones Using Four Wireless Protocols.
Rodemerk KS; Galster JA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):724-731. PubMed ID: 26333880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictability of speech-in-noise performance from real ear measures of directional hearing AIDS.
Dhar S; Humes LE; Calandruccio L; Barlow NN; Hipskind N
Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 15064660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons of speech recognition in noise by mildly-to-moderately hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and FM systems.
Hawkins DB
J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Nov; 49(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 6503247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech perception in noise: directional microphones versus frequency modulation (FM) systems.
Lewis MS; Crandell CC; Valente M; Horn JE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 Jun; 15(6):426-39. PubMed ID: 15341224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A proposed electroacoustic test protocol for personal FM receivers coupled to cochlear implant sound processors.
Schafer EC; Musgrave E; Momin S; Sandrock C; Romine D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):941-54. PubMed ID: 24384080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
Ricketts TA; Picou EM
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of amplification systems in a classroom.
Nábĕlek AK; Donahue AM; Letowski TR
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 3958997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
