BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15192058)

  • 1. Overall prognosis with current treatment of infertility.
    Collins JA; Van Steirteghem A
    Hum Reprod Update; 2004; 10(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 15192058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes from treatment of infertility with natural procreative technology in an Irish general practice.
    Stanford JB; Parnell TA; Boyle PC
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2008; 21(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 18772291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Intrauterine insemination: state-of-the-art in humans].
    Royère D
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Oct; 32(10):873-9. PubMed ID: 15501166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: no single outcome measure is satisfactory when evaluating success in assisted reproduction; both twin births and singleton births should be counted as successes.
    Dickey RP; Sartor BM; Pyrzak R
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):783-7. PubMed ID: 15016781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments.
    Henne MB; Bundorf MK
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 17482603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 17070192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
    Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: challenges in measuring and reporting success rates for assisted reproductive technology treatments: what is optimal?
    Schieve LA; Reynolds MA
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):778-82. PubMed ID: 15033946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of clinical priority access criteria for assisted reproduction and its evaluation on 1386 infertile couples in New Zealand.
    Gillett WR; Peek JC; Herbison GP
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Jan; 27(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 22081248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective longitudinal cohort study on cumulative 5-year delivery and adoption rates among 1338 couples initiating infertility treatment.
    Pinborg A; Hougaard CO; Nyboe Andersen A; Molbo D; Schmidt L
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Apr; 24(4):991-9. PubMed ID: 19136480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Success rates and cost of a live birth following fresh assisted reproduction treatment in women aged 45 years and older, Australia 2002-2004.
    Sullivan E; Wang Y; Chapman M; Chambers G
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Jul; 23(7):1639-43. PubMed ID: 18417497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnosis and management of the infertile couple: missing information.
    ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
    Hum Reprod Update; 2004; 10(4):295-307. PubMed ID: 15192053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Assessing the BESST index for reproduction treatment.
    Davies MJ; Wang JX; Norman RJ
    Hum Reprod; 2004 May; 19(5):1049-51. PubMed ID: 15044408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of the contribution of non-assisted reproductive technology ovulation stimulation fertility treatments to US singleton and multiple births.
    Schieve LA; Devine O; Boyle CA; Petrini JR; Warner L
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 170(11):1396-407. PubMed ID: 19854803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can increased use of ART retrieve the Czech Republic from the low fertility trap?
    Kocourkova J; Fait T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20038934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-specific success rate for women undertaking their first assisted reproduction technology treatment using their own oocytes in Australia, 2002-2005.
    Wang YA; Healy D; Black D; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Jul; 23(7):1633-8. PubMed ID: 18441345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2001 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Sep; 84(3):590-9. PubMed ID: 16169390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use and outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-male factor infertility.
    Kim HH; Bundorf MK; Behr B; McCallum SW
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):622-8. PubMed ID: 17445809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes from assisted reproductive technology.
    Van Voorhis BJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 107(1):183-200. PubMed ID: 16394060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.