These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15192283)

  • 21. Gain in efficiency from using generalized least squares in the Haseman-Elston test.
    Single RM; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):889-94. PubMed ID: 8788027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Haseman-Elston weighted by marker informativity.
    Franke D; Kleensang A; Elston RC; Ziegler A
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S50. PubMed ID: 16451662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Power of regression and maximum likelihood methods to map QTL from sib-pair and DZ twin data.
    Visscher PM; Hopper JL
    Ann Hum Genet; 2001 Nov; 65(Pt 6):583-601. PubMed ID: 11851988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Power of a score test for quantitative trait linkage analysis of relative pairs.
    Goldstein DR; Dudoit S; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000; 19 Suppl 1():S85-91. PubMed ID: 11055375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Testing the robustness of the new Haseman-Elston quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure.
    Allison DB; Fernández JR; Heo M; Beasley TM
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):249-52. PubMed ID: 10820126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robust multipoint linkage analysis: an extension of the Haseman-Elston method.
    Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(2):177-93. PubMed ID: 7607417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Tree-based recursive partitioning methods for subdividing sibpairs into relatively more homogeneous subgroups.
    Shannon WD; Province MA; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 20(3):293-306. PubMed ID: 11255239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gamma regression improves Haseman-Elston and variance components linkage analysis for sib-pairs.
    Barber MJ; Cordell HJ; MacGregor AJ; Andrew T
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 14748009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nonparametric trend statistic incorporating dispersion differences in sib pair linkage for quantitative traits.
    Kim MK; Hong YJ; Song HH
    Hum Hered; 2006; 62(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16954696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of some allele-sharing based linkage analysis methods for detecting complex trait loci.
    Liu Y; Mirea L; Pinnaduwage D; Fallah S; Tritchler D
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S639-42. PubMed ID: 10597506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Regression-based sib pair linkage analysis for binary traits.
    Zeegers MP; Rice JP; Rijsdijk FV; Abecasis GR; Sham PC
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):125-31. PubMed ID: 12931051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A score-statistic approach for the mapping of quantitative-trait loci with sibships of arbitrary size.
    Wang K; Huang J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):412-24. PubMed ID: 11791211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. New multivariate test for linkage, with application to pleiotropy: fuzzy Haseman-Elston.
    Kaabi B; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 May; 24(4):253-64. PubMed ID: 12687642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A statistically robust variance-components approach for quantitative trait linkage analysis.
    Wang J; Guerra R; Cohen J
    Ann Hum Genet; 1999 May; 63(Pt 3):249-62. PubMed ID: 10738537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Linkage analysis: principles and methods for the analysis of human quantitative traits.
    Ferreira MA
    Twin Res; 2004 Oct; 7(5):513-30. PubMed ID: 15527667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Power of a simplified multivariate test for genetic linkage.
    Gorlova OY; Amos CI; Zhu DK; Wang W; Turner S; Boerwinkle E
    Ann Hum Genet; 2002 Nov; 66(Pt 5-6):407-17. PubMed ID: 12485473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Two approaches of quantitative-trait linkage analysis].
    Su SY; Gu DF
    Yi Chuan; 2004 Mar; 26(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 15662739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach.
    Abel L; Alcais A; Mallet A
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 9671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Two-level Haseman-Elston regression for general pedigree data analysis.
    Wang T; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Jul; 29(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 15838848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rank transformation in Haseman-Elston regression using scores for location-scale alternatives.
    Gerhard D; Hothorn LA
    Hum Hered; 2010; 69(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 20029226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.