427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15192848)
1. Coercing conscience: the effort to mandate abortion as a standard of care.
Kramlich M
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 15192848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.
Smolin DM
Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion, conscience and the Constitution: an examination of federal institutional conscience clauses.
Pilpel HF; Patton DE
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):279-305. PubMed ID: 11663597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The abortion debate thirty years later: from choice to coercion.
Kramlich M
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):783-804. PubMed ID: 16700122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Compelling hospitals to provide abortion services.
McKernan MF
Cathol Lawyer; 1974; 20(4):317-27. PubMed ID: 11663556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prescriptions denied: pharmacy clauses have become the latest battleground in the provision of safe and legal medical services.
Limoges RJ
Conscience; 2005; 26(3):36-8. PubMed ID: 16604732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Protection of RU-486 as contraception, emergency contraception and as an abortifacient under the law of contraception.
Wyser-Pratte RC
Oregon Law Rev; 2000; 79(4):1121-56. PubMed ID: 12452141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Saving Roe is not enough: when religion controls healthcare.
Fogel SB; Rivera LA
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):725-49. PubMed ID: 16700119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient autonomy versus religious freedom: should state legislatures require Catholic hospitals to provide emergency contraception to rape victims?
Skeeles HR
Wash Lee Law Rev; 2003; 60(3):1007-48. PubMed ID: 15570676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethics of giving AIDS advice troubles Catholic hospitals.
Navarro M
N Y Times Web; 1993 Jan; ():1, 24. PubMed ID: 11646957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Law and public policy to protect health-care rights of conscience.
Nikas NT
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 15192849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Health workers' choice debated: proposals back right not to treat.
Washington Post; 2006 Jan; ():A1, A9. PubMed ID: 16502551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The legal status of the morning-after pill: abortion or birth control?
Saylor S
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1991; 25(2):401-27. PubMed ID: 11659519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. I have a conscience, too: the plight of medical personnel confronting the right to die.
Loftus IP
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1990; 65(4):699-730. PubMed ID: 16044606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the state action doctrine compel nominally private hospitals to make abortion services available despite "conscience clauses".
Shuger NB
Md Law Forum; 1974; 4(3):113-24. PubMed ID: 11663479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The physician as a conscientious objector.
Bleich JD
Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):245-65. PubMed ID: 15868672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Storm clouds gathering: while the number of mergers wanes, the threats from the Catholic hierarchy to reproductive health care continue.
Stanley L
Conscience; 2004-2005 Winter; 25(3):40-1. PubMed ID: 16538757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. When the shouting has to stop: America and abortion.
Economist; 1992 Apr; 323(7756):15-6. PubMed ID: 16001469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion conscience clauses.
Stern MD
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1975; 11(4):571-627. PubMed ID: 11663680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Michigan Abortion Refusal Act.
White GM
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1975; 8(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11663576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
