BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15192949)

  • 1. Methodologic aspects of evaluating brush samples from biliary strictures by cytology and DNA flow cytometry.
    Bergquist A; Lindberg B; Castro J; Tribukait B
    Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 15192949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of DNA flow cytometry and image cytometry on effusion fluid.
    Saha I; Dey P; Vhora H; Nijhawan R
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Feb; 22(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10649516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective comparison of digital image analysis and routine cytology for the identification of malignancy in biliary tract strictures.
    Baron TH; Harewood GC; Rumalla A; Pochron NL; Stadheim LM; Gores GJ; Therneau TM; De Groen PC; Sebo TJ; Salomao DR; Kipp BR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Mar; 2(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15017605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of DNA ploidy and S-phase evaluation in the assessment of malignancy in biliary strictures.
    Lindberg B; Enochsson L; Tribukait B; Arnelo U; Bergquist A
    Endoscopy; 2006 Jun; 38(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 16802266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strategies for improving diagnostic accuracy of biliary strictures.
    Salomao M; Gonda TA; Margolskee E; Eguia V; Remotti H; Poneros JM; Sethi A; Saqi A
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 123(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 25564796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biliary brushing cytology.
    Selvaggi SM
    Cytopathology; 2004 Apr; 15(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 15056166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved diagnostic yield of endoscopic biliary brush cytology by digital image analysis.
    Rumalla A; Baron TH; Leontovich O; Burgart LJ; Yacavone RF; Therneau TM; de Groen PC; Sebo TJ
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2001 Jan; 76(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 11155409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brush Cytology Performance for the Assessment of Biliopancreatic Strictures.
    Pereira P; Morais R; Vilas-Boas F; Rodrigues-Pinto E; Lopes J; Carneiro F; Macedo G
    Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 31550713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of flow cytometry for DNA content and brush cytology for detection of malignancy in pancreaticobiliary strictures.
    Ryan ME; Baldauf MC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):133-9. PubMed ID: 8013809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited.
    Mehmood S; Loya A; Yusuf MA
    Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 27221813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DNA flow-cytometry on fine needle aspiration cytology of lymph node: how helpful is it?
    Dey P; Saikia UN; Vohra H
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2000 Apr; 43(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 11217267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of IGF2BP3, HOXB7, and NEK2 mRNA expression in brush cytology specimens as a new diagnostic tool in patients with biliary strictures.
    Nischalke HD; Schmitz V; Luda C; Aldenhoff K; Berger C; Feldmann G; Sauerbruch T; Spengler U; Nattermann J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e42141. PubMed ID: 22879911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnosis of biliary strictures in conjunction with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography, with special reference to patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
    Lindberg B; Arnelo U; Bergquist A; Thörne A; Hjerpe A; Granqvist S; Hansson LO; Tribukait B; Persson B; Broomé U
    Endoscopy; 2002 Nov; 34(11):909-16. PubMed ID: 12430077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DNA quantitation of distal bile duct carcinoma measured by image and flow cytometry.
    Rijken AM; Belien JA; van Gulik TM; Polak MM; Offerhaus GJ; Gouma DJ; Baak JP
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1999 Aug; 21(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 10560507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surveillance of primary sclerosing cholangitis with ERC and brush cytology: risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma.
    Boyd S; Mustonen H; Tenca A; Jokelainen K; Arola J; Färkkilä MA
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2017 Feb; 52(2):242-249. PubMed ID: 27806633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The usefulness of cytodiagnosis and DNA cytometry on nasopharyngeal brush smears for the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Chen MH; Chang AR; Lo SY
    Head Neck; 2002 Mar; 24(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 11891953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polysomy and p16 deletion by fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures.
    Gonda TA; Glick MP; Sethi A; Poneros JM; Palmas W; Iqbal S; Gonzalez S; Nandula SV; Emond JC; Brown RS; Murty VV; Stevens PD
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 22100297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of cytologic and acridine-orange flow-cytometric detection of malignant cells in human body cavity fluids.
    Katz RL; Johnson TS; Williamson KD
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1985 Sep; 7(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 4052224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of DNA flow cytometry and immunocytochemical analysis in diagnosis of malignant effusions.
    Kundu R; Handa U; Mohan H
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Oct; 40(10):887-92. PubMed ID: 21485027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of pleural effusions.
    Huang MS; Tsai MS; Wang TH; Lin MS; Chong IW; Chen KL; Hwang JJ
    Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi; 1992 Dec; 8(12):640-6. PubMed ID: 1296045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.