These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15193334)
21. Public perception of prenatal genetic testing: arguments put forward by the public during a participatory policy project in the Netherlands. de Cock Buning T; Broerse JE; Bunders JF Community Genet; 2008; 11(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 18196918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A vital interest: science education and the biotech industry. Industry scientists could play a major role in bringing real-world applications to the classroom. Mascarenhas D Biotechnology (N Y); 1994 Jul; 12(7):671-3. PubMed ID: 7764909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Mind the gap: bringing scientists and society together. Guinovart JJ Cell; 2009 May; 137(5):793-5. PubMed ID: 19490884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Scientific Citizenship and good governance: implications for biotechnology. Davies KG; Wolf-Phillips J Trends Biotechnol; 2006 Feb; 24(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 16380180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Science--or not? The status and dynamics of biotechnology. Buchholz K Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1154-68. PubMed ID: 17597493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Risk as a social phenomenon. Jamison WV Forum Nutr; 2003; 56():327-30. PubMed ID: 15806921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Risky business: perceived behavior of local scientists and community support for their research. McComas KA; Besley JC; Yang Z Risk Anal; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1539-52. PubMed ID: 18808391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biology in politics. Dalyell T Biologist (London); 2000 Apr; 47(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 11190236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is biotechnology a victim of anti-science bias in scientific journals? Miller HI; Morandini P; Ammann K Trends Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):122-5. PubMed ID: 18243381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Science and the American Society. Branscomb LM Am Sci; 1973; 61(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 17712977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology. Savadori L; Savio S; Nicotra E; Rumiati R; Finucane M; Slovic P Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1289-99. PubMed ID: 15563295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Editorial: rethinking science as an area of concern. Notturno M Med Hypotheses; 2006; 66(2):217-9. PubMed ID: 16226845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Qualitative science policy. Mitcham C Qual Health Res; 2007 Dec; 17(10):1434-41. PubMed ID: 18000082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Perception about biotechnology in university students in Costa Rica]. Valdez M; RodrÃguez I; Sittenfeld A Rev Biol Trop; 2004 Sep; 52(3):745-56. PubMed ID: 17361567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. BIO and the next generation. Greenwood J Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Mar; 27(3):232. PubMed ID: 19270666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]