558 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15193596)
1. Nonstationary cluster-size inference with random field and permutation methods.
Hayasaka S; Phan KL; Liberzon I; Worsley KJ; Nichols TE
Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):676-87. PubMed ID: 15193596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combining voxel intensity and cluster extent with permutation test framework.
Hayasaka S; Nichols TE
Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 15325352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantile estimation to derive optimized test thresholds for random field statistics.
Hinrichs H; Scholz M; Noesselt T; Heinze HJ
Neuroimage; 2005 Aug; 27(1):116-29. PubMed ID: 15955713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of the probabilities of 3D clusters in functional brain images.
Ledberg A; Akerman S; Roland PE
Neuroimage; 1998 Aug; 8(2):113-28. PubMed ID: 9740755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adjusting the neuroimaging statistical inferences for nonstationarity.
Salimi-Khorshidi G; Smith SM; Nichols TE
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 1):992-9. PubMed ID: 20426085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A voxelation-corrected non-stationary 3D cluster-size test based on random field theory.
Li H; Nickerson LD; Zhao X; Nichols TE; Gao JH
Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():676-82. PubMed ID: 26067343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power.
Friston KJ; Holmes A; Poline JB; Price CJ; Frith CD
Neuroimage; 1996 Dec; 4(3 Pt 1):223-35. PubMed ID: 9345513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nonstationary noise estimation in functional MRI.
Long CJ; Brown EN; Triantafyllou C; Aharon I; Wald LL; Solo V
Neuroimage; 2005 Dec; 28(4):890-903. PubMed ID: 16129625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cluster mass inference via random field theory.
Zhang H; Nichols TE; Johnson TD
Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 18805493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cluster mass permutation test with contextual enhancement for fMRI activation detection.
Tillikainen L; Salli E; Korvenoja A; Aronen HJ
Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):654-64. PubMed ID: 16769226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the significance of pedobarographic signals using random field theory.
Pataky TC
J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(11):2465-73. PubMed ID: 18585723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining spatial extent and peak intensity to test for activations in functional imaging.
Poline JB; Worsley KJ; Evans AC; Friston KJ
Neuroimage; 1997 Feb; 5(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 9345540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical inference and multiple testing correction in classification-based multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA): random permutations and cluster size control.
Stelzer J; Chen Y; Turner R
Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():69-82. PubMed ID: 23041526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjusting the effect of nonstationarity in cluster-based and TFCE inference.
Salimi-Khorshidi G; Smith SM; Nichols TE
Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(3):2006-19. PubMed ID: 20955803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. fMRI data analysis with nonstationary noise models: a Bayesian approach.
Luo H; Puthusserypady S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1621-30. PubMed ID: 17867354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hidden Markov event sequence models: toward unsupervised functional MRI brain mapping.
Faisan S; Thoraval L; Armspach JP; Foucher JR; Metz-Lutz MN; Heitz F
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 15691723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a non-stationary voxelation-corrected cluster-size test with TFCE for group-Level MRI inference.
Li H; Nickerson LD; Nichols TE; Gao JH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Mar; 38(3):1269-1280. PubMed ID: 27785843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A fully Bayesian approach to the parcel-based detection-estimation of brain activity in fMRI.
Makni S; Idier J; Vincent T; Thirion B; Dehaene-Lambertz G; Ciuciu P
Neuroimage; 2008 Jul; 41(3):941-69. PubMed ID: 18439839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cluster-level statistical inference in fMRI datasets: The unexpected behavior of random fields in high dimensions.
Bansal R; Peterson BS
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 49():101-115. PubMed ID: 29408478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A connectivity-based method for defining regions-of-interest in fMRI data.
Deleus F; Van Hulle MM
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Aug; 18(8):1760-71. PubMed ID: 19414287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
