BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15193607)

  • 1. Localization of realistic cortical activity in MEG using current multipoles.
    Jerbi K; Baillet S; Mosher JC; Nolte G; Garnero L; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):779-93. PubMed ID: 15193607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1.
    Komssi S; Huttunen J; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 15036048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current multipole expansion to estimate lateral extent of neuronal activity: a theoretical analysis.
    Nolte G; Curio G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Oct; 47(10):1347-55. PubMed ID: 11059169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical performance analysis of signal variance-based dipole models for MEG/EEG source localization and detection.
    Rodríguez-Rivera A; Van Veen BD; Wakai RT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 12665027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct reconstruction algorithm of current dipoles for vector magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Nara T; Oohama J; Hashimoto M; Takeda T; Ando S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3859-79. PubMed ID: 17664582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linear inverse solutions: simulations from a realistic head model in MEG.
    Soufflet L; Boeijinga PH
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 16341577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomically constrained dipole adjustment (ANACONDA) for accurate MEG/EEG focal source localizations.
    Im CH; Jung HK; Fujimaki N
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4931-53. PubMed ID: 16204881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A probabilistic algorithm integrating source localization and noise suppression for MEG and EEG data.
    Zumer JM; Attias HT; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(1):102-15. PubMed ID: 17574444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidence limits of dipole source reconstruction results.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1442-51. PubMed ID: 15134713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dipole modeling of epileptic spikes can be accurate or misleading.
    Kobayashi K; Yoshinaga H; Ohtsuka Y; Gotman J
    Epilepsia; 2005 Mar; 46(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 15730537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On noninvasive source imaging of the human K-complex.
    Wennberg R; Cheyne D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 May; 124(5):941-55. PubMed ID: 23200316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomagnetic source detection by maximum entropy and graphical models.
    Amblard C; Lapalme E; Lina JM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Mar; 51(3):427-42. PubMed ID: 15000374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigations of dipole localization accuracy in MEG using the bootstrap.
    Darvas F; Rautiainen M; Pantazis D; Baillet S; Benali H; Mosher JC; Garnero L; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(2):355-68. PubMed ID: 15784414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A hierarchical Bayesian method to resolve an inverse problem of MEG contaminated with eye movement artifacts.
    Fujiwara Y; Yamashita O; Kawawaki D; Doya K; Kawato M; Toyama K; Sato MA
    Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(2):393-409. PubMed ID: 19150653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The coupled dipole model: an integrated model for multiple MEG/EEG data sets.
    Bijma F; de Munck JC; Böcker KB; Huizenga HM; Heethaar RM
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):890-904. PubMed ID: 15528089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of mutual information on independent component analysis in EEG/MEG analysis: a simulation study.
    Neumann A; Grosse-Wentrup M; Buss M; Gramann K
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 118(11):1534-46. PubMed ID: 18853332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distinguishing between moving and stationary sources using EEG/MEG measurements with an application to epilepsy.
    Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Lewine JD; Muravchik CH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 15759577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.