These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15193670)
21. Auditory-visual temporal integration measured by shifts in perceived temporal location. Jaekl PM; Harris LR Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 17428607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity. Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of repeated listening experiences on the recognition of synthetic speech by individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Koul R; Hester K J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 49(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 16533072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. More information on the nature of stereotyped body-rocking. Berkson G; Andriacchi T; Sherman L Am J Ment Retard; 2001 May; 106(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 11389662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Modality and intermittency effects on time estimation. Ortega L; Lopez F; Church RM Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):270-3. PubMed ID: 19429221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The P3 produced by auditory stimuli presented in a passive and active condition: modulation by visual stimuli. Wronka E; Kuniecki M; Kaiser J; Coenen AML Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2007; 67(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 17691223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate. Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Visual stimuli can impair auditory processing in cochlear implant users. Champoux F; Lepore F; Gagné JP; Théoret H Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18824184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults. Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of behavior state conditions and associated environmental variables among students with profound handicaps. Guess D; Roberts S; Siegel-Causey E; Ault M; Guy B; Thompson B; Rues J Am J Ment Retard; 1993 May; 97(6):634-53. PubMed ID: 8517944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Visual search improvement in hemianopic patients after audio-visual stimulation. Bolognini N; Rasi F; Coccia M; Làdavas E Brain; 2005 Dec; 128(Pt 12):2830-42. PubMed ID: 16219672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis. Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction. Corral MJ; Escera C Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Enabling a person with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behaviour to control environmental stimulation with chin movements. Lancioni GE; O'Reilly MF; Sigafoos J; Singh NN; Oliva D; Basili G Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Nov 4-18; 26(21-22):1291-4. PubMed ID: 15513728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effects of two different auditory stimuli on functional arm movement in persons with Parkinson's disease: a dual-task paradigm. Ma HI; Hwang WJ; Lin KC Clin Rehabil; 2009 Mar; 23(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 19129263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention. Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Selective integration of auditory-visual looming cues by humans. Cappe C; Thut G; Romei V; Murray MM Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):1045-52. PubMed ID: 19041883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effects of speech output technology in the learning of graphic symbols. Schlosser RW; Belfiore PJ; Nigam R; Blischak D; Hetzroni O J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(4):537-49. PubMed ID: 14743828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A microswitch-cluster program to foster adaptive responses and head control in students with multiple disabilities: replication and validation assessment. Lancioni GE; Singh NN; O'Reilly MF; Sigafoos J; Oliva D; Gatti M; Manfredi F; Megna G; La Martire ML; Tota A; Smaldone A; Groeneweg J Res Dev Disabil; 2008; 29(4):373-84. PubMed ID: 17681451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]