These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1519378)

  • 21. Informed consent in medical experimentation.
    Burgess MM
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1987 Jan; 20(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 11649817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. University physician-researcher conflicts of interest: the inadequacy of current controls and proposed reform.
    Maatz CT
    High Technol Law J; 1992; 7():137-88. PubMed ID: 11659962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The changing clinical trials scene: the role of the IRB.
    Mitchell SC; Steingrub J
    IRB; 1988; 10(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions.
    Jansson RL
    Wash Law Rev; 2003 Feb; 78(1):229-63. PubMed ID: 15732212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. "How much do you get paid if I volunteer?" Suggested institutional policy on reward, consent, and research.
    La Puma J; Kraut J
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1994; 39(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 10134417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board.
    Levine C; Caplan AL
    IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation.
    Edgar H; Rothman DJ
    Milbank Q; 1995; 73(4):489-506. PubMed ID: 7491097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
    Kobasic DM
    J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. IRB review of a Phase II randomized clinical trial involving incompetent patients suffering from severe closed head injury.
    Prentice ED; Antonson DL; Leibrock LG; Kelso TK; Sears TD
    IRB; 1993; 15(5):1-7. PubMed ID: 11659703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interests, obligations, and justice: some notes toward an ethic of managed care.
    Pellegrino ED
    J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(4):312-7. PubMed ID: 8750589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Are clinical trials in general practice ethical?
    Scoles L; Silagy C
    Aust Fam Physician; 1993 Feb; 22(2):182-3. PubMed ID: 8447786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Research ethics and the medical profession. Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.
    JAMA; 1996 Aug; 276(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 8683820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.
    Macklin R
    IRB; 1989; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conflicting interests, social justice and proxy consent to research.
    Pullman D
    J Med Philos; 2002 Oct; 27(5):523-45. PubMed ID: 12461709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determining risk in pediatric research with no prospect of direct benefit: time for a national consensus on the interpretation of federal regulations.
    Fisher CB; Kornetsky SZ; Prentice ED
    Am J Bioeth; 2007 Mar; 7(3):5-10. PubMed ID: 17366219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ethical and legal considerations in dental caries research involving human subjects.
    Branson R
    J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(Special Issue C):1214-364. PubMed ID: 11651755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Should the Declaration of Helsinki be revised?
    Morens DM
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Dec; 341(24):1851; author reply 1853. PubMed ID: 10610458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.