These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15193790)
1. Polymerization contraction stress of low-shrinkage composites and its correlation with microleakage in class V restorations. Calheiros FC; Sadek FT; Braga RR; Cardoso PE J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):407-12. PubMed ID: 15193790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites. Juloski J; Carrabba M; Aragoneses JM; Forner L; Vichi A; Ferrari M Am J Dent; 2013 Oct; 26(5):271-7. PubMed ID: 24479279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials. Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials. Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in Class V cavities. Ferracane JL; Mitchem JC Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 14579877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in Class II cavities of various resin composites. Civelek A; Ersoy M; L'Hotelier E; Soyman M; Say EC Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 14531612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage evaluation of Silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composite in class II box preparations using two different layering techniques: an in vitro study. Joseph A; Santhosh L; Hegde J; Panchajanya S; George R Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):148. PubMed ID: 23852255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations. Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems. Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations. Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of polymerization technique on microleakage and microhardness of resin composite restorations. Cavalcante LM; Peris AR; Amaral CM; Ambrosano GM; Pimenta LA Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 12670077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation and microleakage of low-shrinking composites after thermocycling and mechanical loading. Hepdeniz OK; Ermis RB Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 May; 22(5):633-641. PubMed ID: 31089017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ Dent Mater; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1150-7. PubMed ID: 16040118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations. Amaral CM; Hara AT; Pimenta LA; Rodrigues AL Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 11806477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites. Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Nathwani H; Burke FJ; Randall RC Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):324-35. PubMed ID: 15766579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of cavity dimensions and their derivatives (volume and 'C' factor) on shrinkage stress development and microleakage of composite restorations. Braga RR; Boaro LC; Kuroe T; Azevedo CL; Singer JM Dent Mater; 2006 Sep; 22(9):818-23. PubMed ID: 16368130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro microleakage of packable composites in Class II restorations. Loguercio AD; de Oliveira Bauer JR; Reis A; Grande RH Quintessence Int; 2004 Jan; 35(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 14765638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs. Sadeghi M Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]