These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15193938)

  • 1. Visual paired comparison performance is impaired in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions and relatively intact item recognition.
    Pascalis O; Hunkin NM; Holdstock JS; Isaac CL; Mayes AR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(10):1293-300. PubMed ID: 15193938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Associative recognition in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions and relatively normal item recognition.
    Mayes AR; Holdstock JS; Isaac CL; Montaldi D; Grigor J; Gummer A; Cariga P; Downes JJ; Tsivilis D; Gaffan D; Gong Q; Norman KA
    Hippocampus; 2004; 14(6):763-84. PubMed ID: 15318334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neonatal aspiration lesions of the hippocampal formation impair visual recognition memory when assessed by paired-comparison task but not by delayed nonmatching-to-sample task.
    Pascalis O; Bachevalier J
    Hippocampus; 1999; 9(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 10641753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans?
    Holdstock JS; Mayes AR; Roberts N; Cezayirli E; Isaac CL; O'Reilly RC; Norman KA
    Hippocampus; 2002; 12(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 12099485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preserved visual recognition memory in an amnesic patient with hippocampal lesions.
    Barbeau EJ; Felician O; Joubert S; Sontheimer A; Ceccaldi M; Poncet M
    Hippocampus; 2005; 15(5):587-96. PubMed ID: 15884094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hippocampal lesions that abolish spatial maze performance spare object recognition memory at delays of up to 48 hours.
    Forwood SE; Winters BD; Bussey TJ
    Hippocampus; 2005; 15(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 15558543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative sparing of item recognition memory in a patient with adult-onset damage limited to the hippocampus.
    Mayes AR; Holdstock JS; Isaac CL; Hunkin NM; Roberts N
    Hippocampus; 2002; 12(3):325-40. PubMed ID: 12099484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fractionation of memory in medial temporal lobe amnesia.
    Bird CM; Shallice T; Cipolotti L
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(6):1160-71. PubMed ID: 17129591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recollection and familiarity in hippocampal amnesia.
    Turriziani P; Serra L; Fadda L; Caltagirone C; Carlesimo GA
    Hippocampus; 2008; 18(5):469-80. PubMed ID: 18306303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the delay-dependent involvement of the hippocampus in object recognition memory.
    Hammond RS; Tull LE; Stackman RW
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2004 Jul; 82(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 15183168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The von Restorff effect in amnesia: the contribution of the hippocampal system to novelty-related memory enhancements.
    Kishiyama MM; Yonelinas AP; Lazzara MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 15006032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociation between recall and recognition memory performance in an amnesic patient with hippocampal damage following carbon monoxide poisoning.
    Bastin C; Linden M; Charnallet A; Denby C; Montaldi D; Roberts N; Andrew M
    Neurocase; 2004 Aug; 10(4):330-44. PubMed ID: 15788271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hippocampal involvement in recollection but not familiarity across time: a prospective study.
    Suchan B; Gayk AE; Schmid G; Köster O; Daum I
    Hippocampus; 2008; 18(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 17932973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Item and order recognition memory in subjects with hypoxic brain injury.
    Hopkins RO; Kesner RP; Goldstein M
    Brain Cogn; 1995 Mar; 27(2):180-201. PubMed ID: 7772332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of familiarization time, retention interval, and context change on adults' performance in the visual paired-comparison task.
    Richmond J; Sowerby P; Colombo M; Hayne H
    Dev Psychobiol; 2004 Mar; 44(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 14994266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medial prefrontal cortex plays a critical and selective role in 'feeling of knowing' meta-memory judgments.
    Modirrousta M; Fellows LK
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct; 46(12):2958-65. PubMed ID: 18606176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recollection and familiarity in dense hippocampal amnesia: a case study.
    Cipolotti L; Bird C; Good T; Macmanus D; Rudge P; Shallice T
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(3):489-506. PubMed ID: 16023686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective disruption of hippocampus-mediated recognition memory processes after episodes of transient global amnesia.
    Jäger T; Szabo K; Griebe M; Bäzner H; Möller J; Hennerici MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 18789957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perirhinal cortex damage and anterograde object-recognition in rats after long retention intervals.
    Mumby DG; Piterkin P; Lecluse V; Lehmann H
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 185(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 17804090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Process dissociation between contextual retrieval and item recognition.
    Weis S; Specht K; Klaver P; Tendolkar I; Willmes K; Ruhlmann J; Elger CE; Fernández G
    Neuroreport; 2004 Dec; 15(18):2729-33. PubMed ID: 15597043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.