BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15195288)

  • 1. Nonlinearity of FMRI responses in human auditory cortex.
    Talavage TM; Edmister WB
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 Jul; 22(3):216-28. PubMed ID: 15195288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mismatch responses to randomized gradient switching noise as reflected by fMRI and whole-head magnetoencephalography.
    Mathiak K; Rapp A; Kircher TT; Grodd W; Hertrich I; Weiskopf N; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 Jul; 16(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 12112773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.
    Gaab N; Gabrieli JD; Glover GH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Aug; 28(8):703-20. PubMed ID: 17080440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term sound temporal envelope characteristics determine multisecond time patterns of activity in human auditory cortex as shown by fMRI.
    Harms MP; Guinan JJ; Sigalovsky IS; Melcher JR
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 93(1):210-22. PubMed ID: 15306629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling hemodynamic responses in auditory cortex at 1.5 T using variable duration imaging acoustic noise.
    Hu S; Olulade O; Castillo JG; Santos J; Kim S; Tamer GG; Luh WM; Talavage TM
    Neuroimage; 2010 Feb; 49(4):3027-38. PubMed ID: 19948232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal pattern of acoustic imaging noise asymmetrically modulates activation in the auditory cortex.
    Ranaweera RD; Kwon M; Hu S; Tamer GG; Luh WM; Talavage TM
    Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():57-68. PubMed ID: 26519093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neuromagnetic responses in silence after musical chord sequences.
    Otsuka A; Tamaki Y; Kuriki S
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(16):1637-41. PubMed ID: 18815583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Application of simultaneous auditory evoked potentials and functional magnetic resonance recordings for examination of central auditory system--preliminary results].
    Milner R; Rusiniak M; Wolak T; Piatkowska-Janko E; Naumczyk P; Bogorodzki P; Senderski A; Ganc M; Skarzyński H
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 21916216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial location is accurately tracked by human auditory sensory memory: evidence from the mismatch negativity.
    Deouell LY; Parnes A; Pickard N; Knight RT
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 24(5):1488-94. PubMed ID: 16987229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of center frequency on binaural auditory filter bandwidth in the human brain.
    Soeta Y; Shimokura R; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2008 Nov; 19(17):1709-13. PubMed ID: 18841088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parametric merging of MEG and fMRI reveals spatiotemporal differences in cortical processing of spoken words and environmental sounds in background noise.
    Renvall H; Formisano E; Parviainen T; Bonte M; Vihla M; Salmelin R
    Cereb Cortex; 2012 Jan; 22(1):132-43. PubMed ID: 21613467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audition of laughing and crying leads to right amygdala activation in a low-noise fMRI setting.
    Sander K; Brechmann A; Scheich H
    Brain Res Brain Res Protoc; 2003 May; 11(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 12738003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.
    Gaab N; Gabrieli JD; Glover GH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Aug; 28(8):721-32. PubMed ID: 17089376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Processing of binaural spatial information in human auditory cortex: neuromagnetic responses to interaural timing and level differences.
    Johnson BW; Hautus MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2610-9. PubMed ID: 20466010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of acoustic masking noise in fMRI of the auditory cortex during phonetic discrimination.
    Shah NJ; Jäncke L; Grosse-Ruyken ML; Müller-Gärtner HW
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Jan; 9(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10030646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of the binaural auditory filter in the human brain.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1939-43. PubMed ID: 18007191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory M50 and M100 responses to broadband noise: functional implications.
    Chait M; Simon JZ; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 2004 Nov; 15(16):2455-8. PubMed ID: 15538173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deconvolution of magnetic acoustic change complex (mACC).
    Bardy F; McMahon CM; Yau SH; Johnson BW
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Nov; 125(11):2220-2231. PubMed ID: 24704142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory evoked fields to variations of interaural time delay.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 383(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 15955427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.