These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15195357)

  • 21. Modulation of event-related potentials in normal human subjects by visual divided attention to spatial and color factors.
    Omoto S; Kuroiwa Y; Li M; Doi H; Shimamura M; Koyano S; Segawa H; Suzuki Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Oct; 311(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 11578828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electrophysiological indices of spatial attention during global/local processing in good and poor phonological decoders.
    Matthews AJ; Martin FH
    Brain Lang; 2009 Dec; 111(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19828188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of attended color on the P1/N1 component of visual event-related potentials.
    Omoto S; Kuroiwa Y; Wang C; Li M; Mizuki N; Hakii Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Dec; 429(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 17980488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ERPs in an oddball task under vection-inducing visual stimulation.
    Stróżak P; Francuz P; Augustynowicz P; Ratomska M; Fudali-Czyż A; Bałaj B
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Dec; 234(12):3473-3482. PubMed ID: 27488367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gender differences in hemispheric asymmetry for face processing.
    Proverbio AM; Brignone V; Matarazzo S; Del Zotto M; Zani A
    BMC Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 7():44. PubMed ID: 16762056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differences in spatio‑temporal distribution of the visual P3b event-related potential between young men and women.
    Maciejewska K; Drzazga Z
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2019; 79(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 31038483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ERP signs of categorical and supra-categorical processing of visual information.
    Zani A; Marsili G; Senerchia A; Orlandi A; Citron FM; Rizzi E; Proverbio AM
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():90-107. PubMed ID: 25447739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Slow fluctuations in attentional control of sensory cortex.
    Kam JW; Dao E; Farley J; Fitzpatrick K; Smallwood J; Schooler JW; Handy TC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 23(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 20146593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Parvocellular and magnocellular contributions to the initial generators of the visual evoked potential: high-density electrical mapping of the "C1" component.
    Foxe JJ; Strugstad EC; Sehatpour P; Molholm S; Pasieka W; Schroeder CE; McCourt ME
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 18784997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electrophysiological evidence of semantic interference in visual search.
    Telling AL; Kumar S; Meyer AS; Humphreys GW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2212-25. PubMed ID: 19803680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory and visual cortical activity during selective attention in fragile X syndrome: a cascade of processing deficiencies.
    Van der Molen MJ; Van der Molen MW; Ridderinkhof KR; Hamel BC; Curfs LM; Ramakers GJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 123(4):720-9. PubMed ID: 21958658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of temporal predictability on exogenous attentional modulation of feedforward processing in the striate cortex.
    Dassanayake TL; Michie PT; Fulham R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():9-16. PubMed ID: 27114044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intra-modal and cross-modal spatial attention to auditory and visual stimuli. An event-related brain potential study.
    Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Münte TF; Sperlich F; Hillyard SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1999 Oct; 8(3):327-43. PubMed ID: 10556609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cortical slow potentials in verbal and spatial tasks--the effect of material, visual hemifield and performing hand.
    Uhl F; Lang W; Lang M; Kornhuber A; Deecke L
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(5):769-75. PubMed ID: 3211297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How handedness influences perceptual and attentional processes during rapid serial visual presentation.
    Śmigasiewicz K; Liebrand M; Landmesser J; Verleger R
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jun; 100():155-163. PubMed ID: 28456522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. P300 hemispheric amplitude asymmetries from a visual oddball task.
    Alexander JE; Porjesz B; Bauer LO; Kuperman S; Morzorati S; O'Connor SJ; Rohrbaugh J; Begleiter H; Polich J
    Psychophysiology; 1995 Sep; 32(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 7568641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sex differences in face gender recognition: an event-related potential study.
    Sun Y; Gao X; Han S
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1327():69-76. PubMed ID: 20153301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gender-selective effects of the P300 and N400 components of the visual evoked potential.
    Steffensen SC; Ohran AJ; Shipp DN; Hales K; Stobbs SH; Fleming DE
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(7):917-25. PubMed ID: 18291436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The right hemisphere fails to orient to the negative valence of visually presented words.
    Thierry G; Kotz SA
    Neuroreport; 2008 Aug; 19(12):1231-4. PubMed ID: 18628671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The deployment of visual attention during temporal integration: an electrophysiological investigation.
    Akyürek EG; Meijerink SK
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Jul; 49(7):885-98. PubMed ID: 22564038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.