These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15195646)
41. A middle ground for stem cells. Levin Y N Y Times Web; 2007 Jan; ():A23. PubMed ID: 17312606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Cloning and stem cells--handicapping the political and scientific debates. Daley GQ N Engl J Med; 2003 Jul; 349(3):211-2. PubMed ID: 12867604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Ethical implications of embryonic stem cell research. Magill G Health Care Ethics USA; 2000; 8(3):E1. PubMed ID: 16184679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Misapplied ethical considerations: U.S. federal stem cell mandates lack global focus and market foresight. Fowler HL Cornell Int Law J; 2004; 36(3):521-44. PubMed ID: 16602208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Embryonic stem cell research: a moral defense. Kamm FM APA Newsl Philos Med; 2003; 2(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 15040337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Stem cells. Restiveness grows at NIH over Bush research restrictions. Holden C Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5720):334-5. PubMed ID: 15831721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The hunting of the snark: the moral status of embryos, right-to-lifers, and Third World women. Charo RA Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995; 6(2):11-37. PubMed ID: 12645597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Address on federal funding of embyronic stem-cell research. Bush GW Origins; 2001 Aug; 31(12):213-5. PubMed ID: 11838494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Scientists draft rules on ethics for stem cells; Academy cites lack of guidelines by U.S. Wade N N Y Times Web; 2005 Apr; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 15926246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Bankrolling stem-cell research with California dollars. Yamamoto KR N Engl J Med; 2004 Oct; 351(17):1711-3. PubMed ID: 15496617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Downside of stem cell policy. N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():A18. PubMed ID: 12156021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Causative vs. beneficial complicity in the embryonic stem cell debate. Robertson JA Conn Law Rev; 2004; 36(4):1099-113. PubMed ID: 15868676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Washington Insider: Congressional impasse on human cloning. Doerflinger RM Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15192847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Politics, culture, and the lab: public attitudes toward animals and human embryonic stem cells have fostered different research agendas in Britain and the United States. Borrego AM Chron High Educ; 2005 Mar; 51(27):A43-5. PubMed ID: 15835079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]