These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15196392)

  • 21. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite-element analysis.
    Canay S; Hersek N; Akpinar I; Aşik Z
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Sep; 27(9):591-8. PubMed ID: 9180415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation.
    Stegaroiu R; Khraisat A; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 15508991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of provisional restoration type on micromovement of implants.
    Holst S; Geiselhoeringer H; Wichmann M; Holst AI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 18762029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures.
    Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17927737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bone level changes at axial- and non-axial-positioned implants supporting fixed partial dentures. A 5-year retrospective longitudinal study.
    Koutouzis T; Wennström JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):585-90. PubMed ID: 17608740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biomechanical load analysis of cantilevered implant systems.
    Osier JF
    J Oral Implantol; 1991; 17(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 1942131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Two-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of bridge design on stress distribution in bone tissues surrounding fixtures of osseointegrated implants in the lower molar region.
    Arataki T; Adachi Y; Kishi M
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1998 Aug; 39(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 9927906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Loading of bone surrounding implants through three-unit fixed partial denture fixation: a finite-element analysis based on in vitro and in vivo strain measurements.
    Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16672032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of abutment's height and framework alloy on the load distribution of mandibular cantilevered implant-supported prosthesis.
    Suedam V; Souza EA; Moura MS; Jacques LB; Rubo JH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 19191796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vivo horizontal bending moments on implants.
    Richter EJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):232-44. PubMed ID: 9581410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Three dimensional finite element stress analysis on superstructure of the fixed bridge supported by tooth-implant].
    Wang XJ; Zhou YM; Liu HY; Wu CL
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Nov; 38(6):414-6. PubMed ID: 14703470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 15248882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of cantilever length and framework alloy on the stress distribution of mandibular-cantilevered implant-supported prostheses.
    Jacques LB; Moura MS; Suedam V; Souza EA; Rubo JH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):737-41. PubMed ID: 19489929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stress distribution after installation of fixed frameworks with marginal gaps over angled and parallel implants: a photoelastic analysis.
    Markarian RA; Ueda C; Sendyk CL; Laganá DC; Souza RM
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 17362421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Occlusal stability in implant prosthodontics -- clinical factors to consider before implant placement.
    Saba S
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2001 Oct; 67(9):522-6. PubMed ID: 11597344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [A study of load stress on an implant and a tooth supported fixed bridge for the first mandibular molar].
    Chao Y; Yang Y; Du C
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 34(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 11776528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.