194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15196613)
1. Larger effect sizes were associated with higher quality ratings in complementary and alternative medicine randomized controlled trials.
Bausell RB; Lee WL; Soeken KL; Li YF; Berman BM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):438-46. PubMed ID: 15196613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. For randomized controlled trials, the quality of reports of complementary and alternative medicine was as good as reports of conventional medicine.
Klassen TP; Pham B; Lawson ML; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):763-8. PubMed ID: 16018911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews.
Lawson ML; Pham B; Klassen TP; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):777-84. PubMed ID: 16018912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Design, quality, and bias in randomized controlled trials of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Karassa FB; Tatsioni A; Ioannidis JP
J Rheumatol; 2003 May; 30(5):979-84. PubMed ID: 12734892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.
Wen J; Ren Y; Wang L; Li Y; Liu Y; Zhou M; Liu P; Ye L; Li Y; Tian W
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):770-5. PubMed ID: 18411041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
Poolman RW; Struijs PA; Krips R; Sierevelt IN; Lutz KH; Bhandari M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16965628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological quality of patient-reported outcome research was low in complementary and alternative medicine in oncology.
Efficace F; Horneber M; Lejeune S; Van Dam F; Leering S; Rottmann M; Aaronson NK
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1257-65. PubMed ID: 17098568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methodological quality and homogeneity influenced agreement between randomized trials and nonrandomized studies of the same intervention for back pain.
Furlan AD; Tomlinson G; Jadad AA; Bombardier C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):209-31. PubMed ID: 18226744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bibliographic study showed improving methodology of meta-analyses published in leading journals 1993-2002.
Gerber S; Tallon D; Trelle S; Schneider M; Jüni P; Egger M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 60(8):773-80. PubMed ID: 17606172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in solid organ transplantation.
Pengel LH; Barcena L; Morris PJ
Transpl Int; 2009 Apr; 22(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 19000234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials.
Goudie AC; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Donald A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):983-91. PubMed ID: 20573483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of herbal medicine interventions.
Gagnier JJ; DeMelo J; Boon H; Rochon P; Bombardier C
Am J Med; 2006 Sep; 119(9):800.e1-11. PubMed ID: 16945616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility.
Dias S; McNamee R; Vail A
Hum Reprod; 2006 Oct; 21(10):2617-27. PubMed ID: 16793995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in cerebral palsy.
Anttila H; Malmivaara A; Kunz R; Autti-Rämö I; Mäkelä M
Pediatrics; 2006 Jun; 117(6):2222-30. PubMed ID: 16740868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overview of studies of treatments for hand eczema-the EDEN hand eczema survey.
Van Coevorden AM; Coenraads PJ; Svensson A; Bavinck JN; Diepgen TL; Naldi L; Elsner P; Williams HC;
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Aug; 151(2):446-51. PubMed ID: 15327553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis of the placebo response in antidepressant trials.
Rief W; Nestoriuc Y; Weiss S; Welzel E; Barsky AJ; Hofmann SG
J Affect Disord; 2009 Nov; 118(1-3):1-8. PubMed ID: 19246102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery--how good are we?
Schöller K; Licht S; Tonn JC; Uhl E
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2009 May; 151(5):519-27; discussion 527. PubMed ID: 19337684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical trial outcome in neuropathic pain: relationship to study characteristics.
Katz J; Finnerup NB; Dworkin RH
Neurology; 2008 Jan; 70(4):263-72. PubMed ID: 17914067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
