These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15196621)

  • 1. The Sharp/van der Heijde method out-performed the Larsen/Scott method on the individual patient level in assessing radiographs in early rheumatoid arthritis.
    Bruynesteyn K; van der Heijde D; Boers M; van der Linden S; Lassere M; van der Vleuten C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):502-12. PubMed ID: 15196621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting radiological changes in rheumatoid arthritis that are considered important by clinical experts: influence of reading with or without known sequence.
    Bruynesteyn K; Van Der Heijde D; Boers M; Saudan A; Peloso P; Paulus H; Houben H; Griffiths B; Edmonds J; Bresnihan B; Boonen A; Van Der Linden S
    J Rheumatol; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2306-12. PubMed ID: 12415585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in rheumatoid arthritis joint damage of the Sharp/van der Heijde and Larsen/Scott scoring methods by clinical experts and comparison with the smallest detectable difference.
    Bruynesteyn K; van der Heijde D; Boers M; Saudan A; Peloso P; Paulus H; Houben H; Griffiths B; Edmonds J; Bresnihan B; Boonen A; van der Linden S
    Arthritis Rheum; 2002 Apr; 46(4):913-20. PubMed ID: 11953967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility and sensitivity to change of 5 methods for scoring hand radiographic damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Guillemin F; Billot L; Boini S; Gerard N; Ødegaard S; Kvien TK
    J Rheumatol; 2005 May; 32(5):778-86. PubMed ID: 15868609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimal clinically important difference in radiological progression of joint damage over 1 year in rheumatoid arthritis: preliminary results of a validation study with clinical experts.
    Bruynesteyn K; van der Heijde D; Boers M; Lassere M; Boonen A; Edmonds J; Houben H; Paulus H; Peloso P; Saudan A; van der Linden S
    J Rheumatol; 2001 Apr; 28(4):904-10. PubMed ID: 11327274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and sensitivity to change of the Simple Erosion Narrowing Score compared with the Sharp-van der Heijde method for scoring radiographs in rheumatoid arthritis.
    Dias EM; Lukas C; Landewé R; Fatenejad S; van der Heijde D
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2008 Mar; 67(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 17644537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Smallest detectable difference in radiological progression.
    Lassere M; Boers M; van der Heijde D; Boonen A; Edmonds J; Saudan A; Verhoeven AC
    J Rheumatol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):731-9. PubMed ID: 10090192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The smallest detectable difference and sensitivity to change of magnetic resonance imaging and radiographic scoring of structural joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis finger, wrist, and toe joints: a comparison of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score applied to different joint combinations and the Sharp/van der Heijde radiographic score.
    Ejbjerg BJ; Vestergaard A; Jacobsen S; Thomsen HS; Østergaard M
    Arthritis Rheum; 2005 Aug; 52(8):2300-6. PubMed ID: 16052593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement error in the assessment of radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trials: the smallest detectable change (SDC) revisited.
    Navarro-Compán V; van der Heijde D; Ahmad HA; Miller CG; Wolterbeek R; Landewé R
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2014 Jun; 73(6):1067-70. PubMed ID: 23606704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and sensitivity to change of a simplification of the Sharp/van der Heijde radiological assessment in rheumatoid arthritis.
    van der Heijde D; Dankert T; Nieman F; Rau R; Boers M
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 1999 Oct; 38(10):941-7. PubMed ID: 10534543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of three radiologic scoring systems for the long-term assessment of rheumatoid arthritis: findings of an ongoing prospective inception cohort study of 132 women followed up for a median of twelve years.
    Drossaers-Bakker KW; Amesz E; Zwinderman AH; Breedveld FC; Hazes JM
    Arthritis Rheum; 2000 Jul; 43(7):1465-72. PubMed ID: 10902747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiography as primary outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: acceptable sample sizes for trials with 3 months' follow up.
    Bruynesteyn K; Landewé R; van der Linden S; van der Heijde D
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2004 Nov; 63(11):1413-8. PubMed ID: 15037445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiographic scoring methods as outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis: properties and advantages.
    Boini S; Guillemin F
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2001 Sep; 60(9):817-27. PubMed ID: 11502606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Documenting damage progression in a two-year longitudinal study of rheumatoid arthritis patients with established disease (the DAMAGE study cohort): is there an advantage in the use of magnetic resonance imaging as compared with plain radiography?
    Bird P; Kirkham B; Portek I; Shnier R; Joshua F; Edmonds J; Lassere M
    Arthritis Rheum; 2004 May; 50(5):1383-9. PubMed ID: 15146407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method.
    van der Heijde D
    J Rheumatol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):743-5. PubMed ID: 10090194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and sensitivity to change of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score in a multireader, longitudinal setting.
    Haavardsholm EA; Ostergaard M; Ejbjerg BJ; Kvan NP; Uhlig TA; Lilleås FG; Kvien TK
    Arthritis Rheum; 2005 Dec; 52(12):3860-7. PubMed ID: 16320333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variability of precision in scoring radiographic abnormalities in rheumatoid arthritis by experienced readers.
    Sharp JT; Wolfe F; Lassere M; Boers M; Van Der Heijde D; Larsen A; Paulus H; Rau R; Strand V
    J Rheumatol; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1062-72. PubMed ID: 15170916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients: radiologic progression and correlation of Genant/Sharp and Larsen scoring methods.
    Genant HK
    Semin Arthritis Rheum; 2001 Apr; 30(5 Suppl 2):26-32. PubMed ID: 11357169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Plain X-rays in rheumatoid arthritis: overview of scoring methods, their reliability and applicability.
    van der Heijde DM
    Baillieres Clin Rheumatol; 1996 Aug; 10(3):435-53. PubMed ID: 8876953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Progression of rheumatoid arthritis on plain radiographs judged differently by expert radiologists and rheumatologists.
    Bruynesteyn K; Van Der Linden S; Landewé R; Gubler F; Weijers R; Van Der Heijde D
    J Rheumatol; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1088-94. PubMed ID: 15170919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.