1397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15196849)
21. [The place of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in surgical treatment of cervical cancer].
Gorchev G; Tomov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 15853003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stages IIB, IIA and bulky stages IB) after concurrent chemoradiation therapy: surgical morbidity and oncological results.
Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Gutowski M; Mourregot A; Fabbro M; Saint-Aubert B; Quenet F; Gourgou S; Kerr C; Rouanet P
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):404-9. PubMed ID: 19555996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Frumovitz M; dos Reis R; Sun CC; Milam MR; Bevers MW; Brown J; Slomovitz BM; Ramirez PT
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 17601902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Kucukmetin A; Biliatis I; Naik R; Bryant A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; 2013(10):CD006651. PubMed ID: 24085528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.
Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. New surgical approaches to treatment of cervical cancer.
Hatch KD; Hallum AV; Nour M
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1996; (21):71-5. PubMed ID: 9023832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stages I and II endometrial cancer. Operating data, follow up and survival.
Zapico A; Fuentes P; Grassa A; Arnanz F; Otazua J; Cortés-Prieto J
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Aug; 98(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15982724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Pérez-Benavente MA; Morchón S; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):531-7. PubMed ID: 18657483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adenosquamous carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma in early-stage cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy: an outcomes analysis.
dos Reis R; Frumovitz M; Milam MR; Capp E; Sun CC; Coleman RL; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Dec; 107(3):458-63. PubMed ID: 17854872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study.
Landoni F; Maneo A; Cormio G; Perego P; Milani R; Caruso O; Mangioni C
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jan; 80(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 11136561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in clinical stage I endometrial cancer: safety, recurrence, and long-term outcome.
Kalogiannidis I; Lambrechts S; Amant F; Neven P; Van Gorp T; Vergote I
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 196(3):248.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17346541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Feasibility, morbidity, and safety of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: our experience.
Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Perone C; Vicario V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 17848319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical-pathologic and morbidity analyses of Types 2 and 3 abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Pikaart DP; Holloway RW; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; Ortiz BH; Denardis SA
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Nov; 107(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 17692367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal versus abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer--a prospective randomized trial.
Malur S; Possover M; Michels W; Schneider A
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Feb; 80(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 11161866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic factors affecting the outcome of early cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and post-operative adjuvant therapy.
Liu MT; Hsu JC; Liu WS; Wang AY; Huang WT; Chang TH; Pi CP; Huang CY; Huang CC; Chou PH; Chen TH
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2008 Mar; 17(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 18302655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].
Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB2 cervical cancer.
Havrilesky LJ; Leath CA; Huh W; Calingaert B; Bentley RC; Soper JT; Alvarez Secord A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 May; 93(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 15099957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Laparoscopic assisted parametrectomy/upper vaginectomy (LPUV)-technique, applications and results.
Fleisch MC; Hatch KD
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Sep; 98(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 16005499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Early cervical cancer and parametrial involvement: is it significant?
Steed H; Capstick V; Schepansky A; Honore L; Hiltz M; Faught W
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Oct; 103(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 16516279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
