91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15197205)
1. Cost minimization study of image-guided core biopsy versus surgical excisional biopsy for women with abnormal mammograms.
Golub RM; Bennett CL; Stinson T; Venta L; Morrow M
J Clin Oncol; 2004 Jun; 22(12):2430-7. PubMed ID: 15197205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiency of Core Biopsy for BI-RADS-5 Breast Lesions.
Wolf R; Quan G; Calhoun K; Soot L; Skokan L
Breast J; 2008; 14(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 18821933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effective use of breast biopsy techniques in a Veterans health care system.
Hatmaker AR; Donahue RM; Tarpley JL; Pearson AS
Am J Surg; 2006 Nov; 192(5):e37-41. PubMed ID: 17071179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between core biopsy and excisional biopsy in breast high-risk lesions.
Margenthaler JA; Duke D; Monsees BS; Barton PT; Clark C; Dietz JR
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):534-7. PubMed ID: 16978969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stereotactic core biopsy reduces the reexcision rate and the cost of mammographically detected cancer.
Lind DS; Minter R; Steinbach B; Abbitt P; Lanier L; Haigh L; Vauthey JN; Russin M; Hackett R; Copeland EM
J Surg Res; 1998 Jul; 78(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9733612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness.
Liberman L; Feng TL; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF
Radiology; 1998 Sep; 208(3):717-23. PubMed ID: 9722851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image-guided core biopsy has advantages over needle localization biopsy for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer.
Whitten TM; Wallace TW; Bird RE; Turk PS
Am Surg; 1997 Dec; 63(12):1072-7; discussion 1077-8. PubMed ID: 9393255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers.
Bilimoria KY; Cambic A; Hansen NM; Bethke KP
Arch Surg; 2007 May; 142(5):441-5; discussion 445-7. PubMed ID: 17515485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biopsy findings after breast conservation therapy for early-stage invasive breast cancer.
Vapiwala N; Starzyk J; Harris EE; Tchou JC; Boraas MC; Czerniecki BJ; Rosato EF; Orel SG; Solin LJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):490-7. PubMed ID: 17544594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Excisional breast biopsy: when, why and how?
Bellantone R; Rossi S; Lombardi CP; Cinini C; Minelli S; Crucitti F
Int Surg; 1995; 80(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 7657498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
Smitt MC; Horst K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique.
Chagpar AB; Martin RC; Hagendoorn LJ; Chao C; McMasters KM
Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 15474434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The clinical significance of lobular neoplasia on breast core biopsy.
Karabakhtsian RG; Johnson R; Sumkin J; Dabbs DJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 May; 31(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17460455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings.
Lee CH; Egglin TK; Philpotts L; Mainiero MB; Tocino I
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):849-54. PubMed ID: 9051045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value.
Vimpeli SM; Saarenmaa I; Huhtala H; Soimakallio S
Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):863-9. PubMed ID: 18618302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.
Orel SG; Rosen M; Mies C; Schnall MD
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16304093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins.
Dzierzanowski M; Melville KA; Barnes PJ; MacIntosh RF; Caines JS; Porter GA
J Surg Oncol; 2005 May; 90(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 15844190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A cost-minimization analysis of alternative strategies in diagnosing pancreatic cancer.
Chen VK; Arguedas MR; Kilgore ML; Eloubeidi MA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Nov; 99(11):2223-34. PubMed ID: 15555006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of referring physician specialty and practice type on referral for image-guided breast biopsy.
Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Gareen IF
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 17411865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
